Skip to content

SNOW-3243341: Python e2e tests for pyarrow and pandas support#532

Closed
sfc-gh-asolarski wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
03-17-snow-3243341_python_e2e_tests_for_pyarrow_and_pandas_support
Closed

SNOW-3243341: Python e2e tests for pyarrow and pandas support#532
sfc-gh-asolarski wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
03-17-snow-3243341_python_e2e_tests_for_pyarrow_and_pandas_support

Conversation

@sfc-gh-asolarski
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator Author


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • merge_queue - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • priority_merge_queue - for urgent changes, fast-track this PR to the front of the merge queue

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@sfc-gh-asolarski sfc-gh-asolarski force-pushed the 03-17-snow-3243341_python_e2e_tests_for_pyarrow_and_pandas_support branch 7 times, most recently from a9a7150 to 08e6aec Compare March 18, 2026 14:53
@sfc-gh-asolarski sfc-gh-asolarski marked this pull request as ready for review March 18, 2026 16:11
@sfc-gh-asolarski sfc-gh-asolarski requested a review from a team as a code owner March 18, 2026 16:11
fail-fast: false
matrix:
os: [ubuntu-latest, windows-11-arm]
py: ["3.9", "3.10", "3.11", "3.12", "3.13", "3.14"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will be conflicting with @sfc-gh-pczajka changes. I would suggest to sort this out as the firs step.

- extras: "no-extras"
extras_suffix: ""
hatch_test_cmd: "all-cov"
hatch_test_args: "--ignore=tests/e2e/pandas"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Personally I would consider having hatch run test-no-pandas instead of juggling args in CI definition

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In fact, we could consider having dedicated hatch env for pandas. This way we may be able to siplify the CI definiition to single command name

@sfc-gh-asolarski sfc-gh-asolarski force-pushed the 03-17-snow-3243341_python_e2e_tests_for_pyarrow_and_pandas_support branch 5 times, most recently from 62cdf8a to 99e9433 Compare March 19, 2026 10:49
@sfc-gh-asolarski sfc-gh-asolarski force-pushed the 03-17-snow-3243341_python_e2e_tests_for_pyarrow_and_pandas_support branch from 99e9433 to 9a2fe15 Compare March 19, 2026 11:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants