Skip to content

tests: Do not patch builtins.open directly#1436

Merged
vojtechtrefny merged 1 commit intostoraged-project:mainfrom
vojtechtrefny:main_coverage-open-fix
Nov 20, 2025
Merged

tests: Do not patch builtins.open directly#1436
vojtechtrefny merged 1 commit intostoraged-project:mainfrom
vojtechtrefny:main_coverage-open-fix

Conversation

@vojtechtrefny
Copy link
Member

@vojtechtrefny vojtechtrefny commented Nov 20, 2025

This causes coverity to fail, because it internally uses open() which we just mocked.

Summary by Sourcery

Update LVM unit tests to patch the open function in the module under test instead of mocking builtins.open to avoid interfering with external tools like Coverity

Bug Fixes:

  • Prevent Coverity analysis failures by limiting open() mocking to the target module namespace

Tests:

  • Patch open in blivet.devicelibs.lvm rather than builtins.open across LVM tests

This causes coverity to fail, because it internally uses open()
which we just mocked.
@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Nov 20, 2025

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Tests updated to mock the module-level open in blivet.devicelibs.lvm instead of patching builtins.open, isolating file operations within the lvm code and avoiding interference with Coverity’s own file usage.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Updated mock target for open from builtins.open to blivet.devicelibs.lvm.open
  • test_lvm_autoactivation initial disable-error scenario
  • test_lvm_autoactivation write-and-verify scenario
  • test_reenable_lvm_autoactivation error scenarios
  • test_reenable_lvm_autoactivation write-and-verify scenario
tests/unit_tests/devicelibs_test/lvm_test.py

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location> `tests/unit_tests/devicelibs_test/lvm_test.py:20` </location>
<code_context>
    def test_lvm_autoactivation(self):
        localconf = "global { event_activation = 0 }"

        with patch("blivet.devicelibs.lvm.open", mock_open(read_data=localconf)):
            # already disabled
            with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError):
                lvm.disable_lvm_autoactivation()

        localconf = ""
        with patch("blivet.devicelibs.lvm.open", mock_open(read_data=localconf)) as m:
            lvm.disable_lvm_autoactivation()
            m.assert_called_with("/etc/lvm/lvmlocal.conf", "a")
            handle = m()
            handle.write.assert_called_once_with("global { event_activation = 0 }")

        localconf = "test\ntest"
        with patch("blivet.devicelibs.lvm.open", mock_open(read_data=localconf)) as m:
            # not disabled
            with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError):
                lvm.reenable_lvm_autoactivation()

        localconf = "# global { event_activation = 0 }"
        with patch("blivet.devicelibs.lvm.open", mock_open(read_data=localconf)) as m:
            # not disabled
            with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError):
                lvm.reenable_lvm_autoactivation()

        localconf = "test\nglobal { event_activation = 0 }"
        with patch("blivet.devicelibs.lvm.open", mock_open(read_data=localconf)) as m:
            lvm.reenable_lvm_autoactivation()
            m.assert_called_with("/etc/lvm/lvmlocal.conf", "w+")
            handle = m()
            handle.write.assert_called_once_with("test\n")

</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
**issue (code-quality):** Extract duplicate code into method ([`extract-duplicate-method`](https://docs.sourcery.ai/Reference/Default-Rules/refactorings/extract-duplicate-method/))
</issue_to_address>

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@vojtechtrefny vojtechtrefny merged commit 84b6771 into storaged-project:main Nov 20, 2025
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant