Ships Telnetd #213
Merged
Ships Telnetd #213
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Informatic
reviewed
Jun 15, 2025
throwaway96
reviewed
Jun 15, 2025
throwaway96
reviewed
Jun 18, 2025
|
Are there any other Telnet daemons that might be better than the one from BusyBox? Although I guess we're generally not using most of the features anyway, so it probably doesn't matter. |
mariotaku
force-pushed
the
feature/ship-telnetd
branch
from
dd19429 to
7f4c8b0
Compare
|
@throwaway96 I think the busybox one is the best (small, has the same arguments and comes with frequent security patches although telnetd doesn't seem to need one) |
throwaway96
approved these changes
Jun 21, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds telnetd from busybox. And uses shipped one in case there is no telnetd in system PATH. Solves #210.