Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multiple fixes #196

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 14, 2020
Merged

Multiple fixes #196

merged 3 commits into from
May 14, 2020

Conversation

GuillaumeDSM
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ async def _build_trader(self):

async def _build_modes(self):
try:
init_trading_mode_config(self.config)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Managed by tentacle manager ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

By OctoBot, it's related to the advanced manager (when we figure out advanced classes). Maybe we should move it into the tentacle manager if we decide it's its role to manage advanced classes in the future

Copy link
Member

@Herklos Herklos May 13, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes it should be better in Tentacle manager, I don't think Octobot have to do that.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ def _load_config_symbols_and_time_frames(self):
client = self.exchange.client
if client:
self.client_symbols = client.symbols
self.client_time_frames = list(client.timeframes.values()) if hasattr(client, "timeframes") else []
self.client_time_frames = list(client.timeframes) if hasattr(client, "timeframes") else []
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We keep only keys now right ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, list(dict) returns a list of its keys

Copy link
Member

@Herklos Herklos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@GuillaumeDSM GuillaumeDSM merged commit e4857cc into master May 14, 2020
@GuillaumeDSM GuillaumeDSM deleted the multiple_fixes branch May 14, 2020 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants