Skip to content

Conversation

catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7889

Describe changes:

  • Move a bunch of keywords to using generic integers framework, allowing negation, >=, hexadecimal notation, etc..

Still one left to do : ip_proto

SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#2692

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 16, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 85.50725% with 30 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 84.42%. Comparing base (93c0409) to head (47fc3e4).
⚠️ Report is 15 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #14043      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.43%   84.42%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1011     1010       -1     
  Lines      272251   271942     -309     
==========================================
- Hits       229876   229596     -280     
+ Misses      42375    42346      -29     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 63.36% <67.76%> (-0.05%) ⬇️
livemode 19.41% <5.92%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
pcap 44.82% <17.10%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
suricata-verify 65.24% <51.65%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
unittests 59.44% <63.10%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline = 28008

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased in #14071

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants