Detect integers 7889 v8

[catenacyber]

Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7889

Describe changes:

• Move a bunch of keywords to using generic integers framework, allowing negation, >=, hexadecimal notation, etc..

Still one left to do : ip_proto

SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#2692

#14043 with needed rebase

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 85.50725% with 30 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 84.44%. Comparing base (a1613fe) to head (5909a64).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #14071      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.45%   84.44%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1013     1012       -1     
  Lines      271927   271618     -309     
==========================================
- Hits       229662   229375     -287     
+ Misses      42265    42243      -22     

Flag	Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus	63.35% <67.76%> (-0.06%)	⬇️
livemode	19.49% <5.92%> (+0.11%)	⬆️
pcap	44.90% <17.10%> (+0.09%)	⬆️
suricata-verify	65.33% <51.65%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
unittests	59.45% <63.10%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[victorjulien]

nit: SCNtohs

I see the codebase isn't fully clean, so I wonder if we still need it. It was added a long time ago to work around some windows issue.