[Draft] main/options: Limit verbose option count

[jlucovsky]

Continuation of #14176

Issue: 7389

Continue to recognize multiple 'v' specifications upto the maximum recognized. The maximum recognized is the number of slots between the NOTICE and CONFIG levels.

Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7389

Describe changes:

• Ignore extra -v command line usages.
  Update:
• New PR as s-v tests have been updated.

Provide values to any of the below to override the defaults.

• To use a Suricata-Verify or Suricata-Update pull request,
  link to the pull request in the respective _BRANCH variable.
• Leave unused overrides blank or remove.

SV_REPO=
SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#2723
SU_REPO=
SU_BRANCH=

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.20%. Comparing base (a16e87b) to head (eb15dc3).
⚠️ Report is 53 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #14183      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.18%   84.20%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1013     1013              
  Lines      262231   262237       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits       220747   220805      +58     
+ Misses      41484    41432      -52     

Flag	Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus	63.39% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
livemode	18.71% <66.66%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
pcap	44.64% <0.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
suricata-verify	64.86% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
unittests	59.20% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[jufajardini]

neat word selection :D

[jufajardini]

Debian 11 was failing, re-ran it.

Hmm, still failing. One of the checked config options isn't there for this build, maybe?

[suricata-qa]

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline = 28126

[catenacyber]

===> bug-7389: Sub test #1: FAIL : grep "Suricata-Main.*Config:" suricata.log | grep -v -e "Core dump size" -e "Landlock" -e "RWX pages" | wc -l | xargs

PASSED:  2056
FAILED:  1
SKIPPED: 68

I guess the SV test needs to be as simple as possible with just a log line that is added in verbose mode whatever the OS/arch/etc...

[jlucovsky]

===> bug-7389: Sub test #1: FAIL : grep "Suricata-Main.*Config:" suricata.log | grep -v -e "Core dump size" -e "Landlock" -e "RWX pages" | wc -l | xargs

PASSED:  2056
FAILED:  1
SKIPPED: 68

I guess the SV test needs to be as simple as possible with just a log line that is added in verbose mode whatever the OS/arch/etc...

Yes .... that's what I was thinking as well for more determinism, something like
Config: Suricata verbose level set to <x>

[jlucovsky]

Continued in #14267