Skip to content

Conversation

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member

@IAlibay IAlibay commented Dec 11, 2024

Checklist

  • Added a news entry

Developers certificate of origin

@github-actions
Copy link

🚨 API breaking changes detected! 🚨

@github-actions
Copy link

🚨 API breaking changes detected! 🚨

@github-actions
Copy link

🚨 API breaking changes detected! 🚨

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 87.18775% with 159 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 92.88%. Comparing base (b7a49df) to head (5c8ef53).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../tests/protocols/openmm_abfe/test_abfe_energies.py 29.16% 68 Missing ⚠️
...enfe/tests/protocols/openmm_abfe/test_abfe_slow.py 17.74% 51 Missing ⚠️
...e/protocols/openmm_afe/equil_binding_afe_method.py 94.95% 16 Missing ⚠️
.../tests/protocols/openmm_abfe/test_abfe_protocol.py 93.87% 15 Missing ⚠️
openfe/protocols/openmm_afe/base.py 82.35% 6 Missing ⚠️
.../tests/protocols/openmm_abfe/test_abfe_settings.py 93.93% 2 Missing ⚠️
...enfe/tests/protocols/openmm_ahfe/test_ahfe_slow.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1045      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.46%   92.88%   -2.58%     
==========================================
  Files         174      183       +9     
  Lines       14584    15765    +1181     
==========================================
+ Hits        13923    14644     +721     
- Misses        661     1121     +460     
Flag Coverage Δ
fast-tests 92.88% <87.18%> (?)
slow-tests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@IAlibay IAlibay requested a review from hannahbaumann October 17, 2025 11:55
Copy link
Contributor

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@IAlibay I'll approve the PR, pending the lambda restraints discussion on Monday!

# interacting (which would be non-interacting for us)
lambdas['lambda_electrostatics'] = [1-x for x in lambda_elec]
lambdas['lambda_sterics'] = [1-x for x in lambda_vdw]
lambdas['lambda_restraints'] = [x for x in lambda_rest]
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just double checking @hannahbaumann - this is correct now right? I.e. the factory expects 0 as not applied and 1 as fully interacting, so we just let it be the way it is.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this looks good!

Copy link
Contributor

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @IAlibay , the restraints settings look good to me! just left a spelling suggestion and a question regarding some comments, but will already approve since those are not that important.

# interacting (which would be non-interacting for us)
lambdas['lambda_electrostatics'] = [1-x for x in lambda_elec]
lambdas['lambda_sterics'] = [1-x for x in lambda_vdw]
lambdas['lambda_restraints'] = [x for x in lambda_rest]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this looks good!

0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0,
0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.65, 0.7, 0.75, 0.8, 0.85, 0.9, 0.95, 1.0],
lambda_restraints=[
0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this is matching now!

@github-actions
Copy link

No API break detected ✅

@IAlibay IAlibay merged commit 66d14f6 into main Oct 21, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@IAlibay IAlibay deleted the abfe_protocol branch October 21, 2025 10:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants