-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
ABFE protocol #1045
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ABFE protocol #1045
Conversation
|
🚨 API breaking changes detected! 🚨 |
|
🚨 API breaking changes detected! 🚨 |
|
🚨 API breaking changes detected! 🚨 |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1045 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 95.46% 92.88% -2.58%
==========================================
Files 174 183 +9
Lines 14584 15765 +1181
==========================================
+ Hits 13923 14644 +721
- Misses 661 1121 +460
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
hannahbaumann
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@IAlibay I'll approve the PR, pending the lambda restraints discussion on Monday!
| # interacting (which would be non-interacting for us) | ||
| lambdas['lambda_electrostatics'] = [1-x for x in lambda_elec] | ||
| lambdas['lambda_sterics'] = [1-x for x in lambda_vdw] | ||
| lambdas['lambda_restraints'] = [x for x in lambda_rest] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just double checking @hannahbaumann - this is correct now right? I.e. the factory expects 0 as not applied and 1 as fully interacting, so we just let it be the way it is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this looks good!
hannahbaumann
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @IAlibay , the restraints settings look good to me! just left a spelling suggestion and a question regarding some comments, but will already approve since those are not that important.
| # interacting (which would be non-interacting for us) | ||
| lambdas['lambda_electrostatics'] = [1-x for x in lambda_elec] | ||
| lambdas['lambda_sterics'] = [1-x for x in lambda_vdw] | ||
| lambdas['lambda_restraints'] = [x for x in lambda_rest] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this looks good!
| 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, | ||
| 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.65, 0.7, 0.75, 0.8, 0.85, 0.9, 0.95, 1.0], | ||
| lambda_restraints=[ | ||
| 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this is matching now!
Co-authored-by: Hannah Baumann <[email protected]>
|
No API break detected ✅ |
Checklist
newsentryDevelopers certificate of origin