CoFold fix #37
Open
CoFold fix #37
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…removing the first three nucleotides of the second structure
…w function, add the strands and the extra links
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I tried to fix the problem of cofolding, like issue #36. The first two nucleotides in cofolded structures are not displayed and the structure returned from Fornac doesn't contain the '&' symbol. But Fornac fully supports a cofolded sequence when an ssRNA structure is edited inside the container. So I removed handling structure breaks (the '&' symbol) in RNAGraph and RNAutils. When using addRNA, the RNA structure checks for breaks and splits (similarly to when it is modified).