Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release arrow-rs / parquet major version 55.0.0 (Apr 2025) #7084

Closed
6 of 8 tasks
Tracked by #7392
alamb opened this issue Feb 6, 2025 · 12 comments
Closed
6 of 8 tasks
Tracked by #7392

Release arrow-rs / parquet major version 55.0.0 (Apr 2025) #7084

alamb opened this issue Feb 6, 2025 · 12 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Any new improvement worthy of a entry in the changelog

Comments

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Feb 6, 2025

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.

Our release schedule is here https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs?tab=readme-ov-file#release-versioning-and-schedule

Part of

Items to fix before the release:

Describe the solution you'd like

Create a release

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

@alamb 's wishlist of features:

@kylebarron 's wishlist of features

@alamb alamb added the enhancement Any new improvement worthy of a entry in the changelog label Feb 6, 2025
@mbrobbel
Copy link
Member

Items for the next major release: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20label%3Anext-major-release%20

(title should be updated minor -> major)

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Feb 19, 2025

Items for the next major release: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20label%3Anext-major-release%20

(title should be updated minor -> major)

Thank you -- and I updated the title of the ticekt

@alamb alamb changed the title Release arrow-rs / parquet minor version 55.0.0 (Apr 2025) Release arrow-rs / parquet major version 55.0.0 (Apr 2025) Feb 19, 2025
@tustvold
Copy link
Contributor

tustvold commented Mar 5, 2025

We should probably try to get #7238 and by extension the update to object_store 0.12.0 (once released) into this release.

@xmakro
Copy link
Contributor

xmakro commented Mar 14, 2025

upgrading pyo3 dependency to 24.0 would be good to include

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Mar 15, 2025

upgrading pyo3 dependency to 24.0 would be good to include

Thanks @xmakro there is a PR to do so. We'll get it in

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Mar 26, 2025

I hope to make this release next week sometime as it has a substantial number of accumulated upgrades and features

@kylebarron
Copy link
Contributor

I would love to consider #7334 for the 55 release, if we can find consensus.

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Mar 26, 2025

I would love to consider #7334 for the 55 release, if we can find consensus.

Thanks -- added to the list

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Apr 8, 2025

I have created a release candidate and a voting thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/npdj3h4yjd73g088v6546lz44t2lswon

@mbrobbel
Copy link
Member

mbrobbel commented Apr 8, 2025

I guess it's too late to include the following PRs?

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Apr 9, 2025

I guess it's too late to include the following PRs?

We can create another RC, but I would recommend against it.

Neither of those PRs is ready (reviewed / approved ready for merge)

Maybe we could get them ready if we wanted to try in the next major release

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Apr 11, 2025

The release has been approved and published to distribution sites and crates.io 🎉

https://lists.apache.org/thread/npdj3h4yjd73g088v6546lz44t2lswon

https://crates.io/crates/arrow/55.0.0

@alamb alamb closed this as completed Apr 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Any new improvement worthy of a entry in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants