Skip to content

refactor(motion_velocity_planner): simplify insert stop point function #375

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maxime-clem
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Minor change to simplify the function to add stop points to the motion velocity planner trajectory.

Related links

Parent Issue:

  • Link

How was this PR tested?

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

None.

Effects on system behavior

None.

@maxime-clem maxime-clem added the run:build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci) label Apr 14, 2025
@maxime-clem maxime-clem requested review from mkquda, youtalk and a team as code owners April 14, 2025 05:49
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 14, 2025

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 14, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (4cb18f5) to head (c9e8f05).
Report is 317 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...nner/autoware_motion_velocity_planner/src/node.cpp 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #375       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.75%   0.00%   -78.76%     
==========================================
  Files          11     105       +94     
  Lines         193    7408     +7215     
  Branches       73    1342     +1269     
==========================================
- Hits          152       0      -152     
- Misses         11    7408     +7397     
+ Partials       30       0       -30     
Flag Coverage Δ
differential 0.00% <0.00%> (?)
total ?

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mitsudome-r
Copy link
Member

Could you explain how this modification is tested?

Copy link
Member

@youtalk youtalk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM if the modification is tested in a unit test.

@maxime-clem
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for your reviews. I will add a unit test when I find the time 🙏

@youtalk
Copy link
Member

youtalk commented May 21, 2025

@maxime-clem Do you have the time? If not, please test the node execution.

@youtalk youtalk requested a review from mitsudome-r May 21, 2025 06:12
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 20, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity.

@stale stale bot added the status:stale Inactive or outdated issues. (auto-assigned) label Jul 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
run:build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci) status:stale Inactive or outdated issues. (auto-assigned)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants