-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix Issue #350: Add test case for verifying the IfcMaterialLayerSet name (LayerSetName) in material test cases #351
Open
giuseppeverduciALMA
wants to merge
3
commits into
buildingSMART:development
Choose a base branch
from
giuseppeverduciALMA:development
base: development
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
25 changes: 25 additions & 0 deletions
25
...mentersDocumentation/TestCases/material/pass-a_layer_set_name_will_pass_a_value_check.ids
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ | ||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> | ||
<ids xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://standards.buildingsmart.org/IDS http://standards.buildingsmart.org/IDS/1.0/ids.xsd" xmlns="http://standards.buildingsmart.org/IDS"> | ||
<info> | ||
<title>A layer set name will pass the value check</title> | ||
<description>Generated via code automation in the Ids Repository on github.</description> | ||
</info> | ||
<specifications> | ||
<specification name="A layer set name will pass the value check" ifcVersion="IFC2X3 IFC4"> | ||
<applicability maxOccurs="unbounded"> | ||
<entity> | ||
<name> | ||
<simpleValue>IFCWALL</simpleValue> | ||
</name> | ||
</entity> | ||
</applicability> | ||
<requirements> | ||
<material> | ||
<value> | ||
<simpleValue>Bar</simpleValue> | ||
</value> | ||
</material> | ||
</requirements> | ||
</specification> | ||
</specifications> | ||
</ids> |
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions
14
...mentersDocumentation/TestCases/material/pass-a_layer_set_name_will_pass_a_value_check.ifc
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | ||
ISO-10303-21; | ||
HEADER; | ||
FILE_DESCRIPTION(('ViewDefinition [CoordinationView]'),'2;1'); | ||
FILE_NAME('','2022-10-07T13:48:44',(),(),'IfcOpenShell v0.7.0-dc67287d','IfcOpenShell v0.7.0-dc67287d',''); | ||
FILE_SCHEMA(('IFC4')); | ||
ENDSEC; | ||
DATA; | ||
#1=IFCWALL('1hqIFTRjfV6AWq_bMtnZwI',$,$,$,$,$,$,$,$); | ||
#2=IFCMATERIALLAYERSET((#5),'Bar',$); | ||
#3=IFCRELASSOCIATESMATERIAL('05rScmOVzMoQXOfbYdtLYj',$,$,$,(#1),#2); | ||
#4=IFCMATERIAL('Unnamed',$,$); | ||
#5=IFCMATERIALLAYER(#4,1.,$,'Foo',$,$,$); | ||
ENDSEC; | ||
END-ISO-10303-21; |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @giuseppeverduciALMA,
Aren't these match expression a bit too broad? I'm concerned the will end up excluding useful files
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right to point that out; I see how the match expressions in the
.gitignore
could potentially be too broad. The intent was to exclude only generated and compiled files specific to the build process, especially those in theSchemaProject
andbuild
directories, which are recreated with each compilation and don't exist in the source repository.For example, with a modification like this:
we would exclude only the files resulting from the compilation while still allowing the commit of the
SchemaProject/Ids.cs
file, which is autogenerated (would it be helpful to keep this file?).How could we further refine these expressions to minimize any risk of excluding useful files?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we already have similar matches in the current gitignore, I wonder if you need a local "git clean -xdf" and see if you still have undesired artifacts after compilation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've removed the two entries from the .gitignore after running the clean command. Thanks for the guidance!