Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add enumType to MessageDefinitionField #7

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024
Merged

Add enumType to MessageDefinitionField #7

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024

Conversation

jtbandes
Copy link
Member

@jtbandes jtbandes commented Nov 6, 2024

Adds an enumType?: string field to MessageDefinitionField.

Bumps package version to 0.4.0.

@jtbandes jtbandes changed the title Add enumName to MessageDefinitionField Add enumType to MessageDefinitionField Nov 6, 2024
@jtbandes jtbandes marked this pull request as ready for review November 7, 2024 19:23
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "@foxglove/message-definition",
"version": "0.3.1",
"version": "0.4.0",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We usually do this in a follow-up PR don't we? In case theres some other things merging?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤷 I don't think we're consistent about it.

Copy link

@indirectlylit indirectlylit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@jtbandes jtbandes merged commit a33085e into main Nov 7, 2024
1 check passed
@jtbandes jtbandes deleted the jacob/enum branch November 7, 2024 20:32
jtbandes added a commit to foxglove/omgidl that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
### Changelog
omgidl-parser: `parseIDL` now fills in `enumType` names
(foxglove/message-definition#7).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants