fix: form value bug fixes #1022
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes made in this pull request focus on enhancing the handling of the skip export form's validity across multiple integration components. Key updates include the addition of event bindings, new properties and methods to track form validity, modifications to HTML templates to conditionally disable buttons, and improvements to validation logic. These adjustments aim to ensure that the skip export functionality responds appropriately to user input. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
PR title must start with "fix:", "feat:", "chore:", "refactor", or "test:" (case-insensitive) |
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
2 similar comments
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (27)
src/app/integrations/sage300/sage300-shared/sage300-advanced-settings/sage300-advanced-settings.component.html (2)
87-88: LGTM! Consider clarifying the method name.The addition of the
invalidSkipExportFormevent binding is a good practice for handling form validation at the parent component level. This allows for better control and coordination of the overall form state.For improved clarity, consider renaming the handler method to distinguish it from the event name:
- (invalidSkipExportForm)="invalidSkipExportForm($event)" + (invalidSkipExportForm)="handleInvalidSkipExportForm($event)"This change would make it clearer that the method is handling the event, rather than being the event itself.
98-98: LGTM! Consider optimizing condition order.The addition of
isSkipExportFormInvalidto theisButtonDisabledcondition is a good improvement. It ensures that the footer button remains disabled when the skip export form is invalid, maintaining consistency with the overall form state.For potential performance optimization, consider reordering the conditions based on their likelihood of being false. This can help short-circuit the evaluation process. For example:
- [isButtonDisabled]="!advancedSettingForm.valid || !skipExportForm.valid || !getSkipExportValue() || isSkipExportFormInvalid" + [isButtonDisabled]="isSkipExportFormInvalid || !advancedSettingForm.valid || !skipExportForm.valid || !getSkipExportValue()"Assuming
isSkipExportFormInvalidis more likely to betrue(thus disabling the button) than the other conditions, this order might lead to faster evaluation in some cases.src/app/integrations/business-central/business-central-shared/business-central-advanced-settings/business-central-advanced-settings.component.html (2)
89-90: LGTM! Consider a minor naming improvement.The addition of the
(invalidSkipExportForm)event binding enhances the component's ability to handle form validation errors, which aligns well with the PR's objective of fixing form value bugs.For improved clarity, consider renaming the event to distinguish it from the handler method:
- (invalidSkipExportForm)="invalidSkipExportForm($event)" + (skipExportFormInvalid)="handleInvalidSkipExportForm($event)"This change would make it clearer that we're binding an event to a handler method, rather than using the same name for both.
89-90: Summary: Improved form validation enhances user experienceThe changes in this file significantly improve the form validation process for the Business Central advanced settings component. By adding an event binding for invalid skip export forms and updating the button disabled state, the component now provides better feedback and prevents incorrect submissions. These enhancements align well with the PR's objective of fixing form value bugs and will contribute to a more robust user experience.
Consider implementing a comprehensive form validation strategy across all components in the application to ensure consistency in error handling and user feedback. This could involve creating a shared service or directive for form validation that can be reused across different components.
Also applies to: 98-98
src/app/shared/components/si/helper/skip-export/skip-export.component.html (2)
96-97: Approve the addition of the distinct condition validation.The new error message for distinct condition validation is a good addition. It improves the user experience by providing more specific feedback and helps prevent invalid form submissions.
Consider adding an
aria-live="polite"attribute to the error message component to improve accessibility for screen readers. This will ensure that users are notified of the error message when it appears.- <app-mandatory-error-message *ngIf="checkValidationCondition()" - [customErrorMessage]="'Condition selected should be distinct.'"></app-mandatory-error-message> + <app-mandatory-error-message *ngIf="checkValidationCondition()" + [customErrorMessage]="'Condition selected should be distinct.'" aria-live="polite"></app-mandatory-error-message>
Line range hint
1-124: Enhance form accessibilityWhile the addition of the new error message is good, consider improving the overall accessibility of the form:
- Add
aria-required="true"to all required form controls.- Use
aria-describedbyto associate error messages with their respective form controls.- Ensure all form controls have associated labels (either visible or using
aria-label).Here's an example of how to implement these suggestions for the first condition dropdown:
- <p-dropdown appendTo="body" [options]="conditionFieldOptions" formControlName="condition1" placeholder="Select Condition"> + <p-dropdown appendTo="body" [options]="conditionFieldOptions" formControlName="condition1" placeholder="Select Condition" + aria-required="true" [attr.aria-describedby]="'condition1-error'"> <!-- ... --> </p-dropdown> - <app-mandatory-error-message *ngIf="skipExportForm.controls.condition1.touched && !skipExportForm.controls.condition1.valid" - [customErrorMessage]="'Please select the condition'"></app-mandatory-error-message> + <app-mandatory-error-message *ngIf="skipExportForm.controls.condition1.touched && !skipExportForm.controls.condition1.valid" + [customErrorMessage]="'Please select the condition'" id="condition1-error" aria-live="polite"></app-mandatory-error-message>Apply similar changes to other form controls and their associated error messages throughout the template.
src/app/integrations/business-central/business-central-shared/business-central-advanced-settings/business-central-advanced-settings.component.ts (1)
75-77: Approve with suggestion: Consider renaming the method for clarity.The
invalidSkipExportFormmethod effectively updates the component's state based on the form's validity. However, the method name could be more descriptive.Consider renaming the method to
updateSkipExportFormValidityorsetSkipExportFormInvalidto more accurately reflect its purpose:updateSkipExportFormValidity($event: boolean) { this.isSkipExportFormInvalid = $event; }src/app/integrations/sage300/sage300-shared/sage300-advanced-settings/sage300-advanced-settings.component.ts (2)
84-86: Consider renaming the method for clarity.The
invalidSkipExportFormmethod is a good addition for updating the form's validity state. However, the name might be misleading as it doesn't actually invalidate the form. Consider renaming it to something more descriptive of its action, such asupdateSkipExportFormValidityorsetSkipExportFormInvalid.
Line range hint
233-233: Good addition of form validity check, consider refactoring for better separation of concerns.The addition of the skip export form validity check before saving is a good practice. It ensures that only valid data is processed and saved.
However, the
constructPayloadAndSavemethod is handling multiple responsibilities (constructing payload, saving data, handling responses, and navigation). Consider refactoring this method into smaller, more focused methods for better maintainability and separation of concerns.src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-shared/qbo-advanced-settings/qbo-advanced-settings.component.ts (2)
99-101: Consider a more descriptive method name.The method
invalidSkipExportFormupdates the form validity state correctly. However, to improve clarity, consider renaming it to something more descriptive likeupdateSkipExportFormValidity.-invalidSkipExportForm($event: boolean) { +updateSkipExportFormValidity($event: boolean) { this.isSkipExportFormInvalid = $event; }
Line range hint
232-255: Consider refactoring for better separation of concerns.The
getSettingsAndSetupFormmethod has been expanded to include setup for both advanced settings and skip export functionality. While the implementation looks correct, consider refactoring this method to improve readability and maintainability:
- Extract the skip export form setup into a separate method.
- Consider creating a dedicated method for setting up form watchers.
This refactoring will make the code more modular and easier to maintain in the future.
Here's a suggested refactoring:
private getSettingsAndSetupForm(): void { this.isOnboarding = this.router.url.includes('onboarding'); forkJoin([ // ... (keep the existing forkJoin calls) ]).subscribe(([sage300AdvancedSettingResponse, expenseFiltersGet, expenseFilterCondition, billPaymentAccounts, adminEmails, workspaceGeneralSettings]) => { // ... (keep the existing property assignments) this.setupAdvancedSettingsForm(sage300AdvancedSettingResponse, expenseFiltersGet, adminEmails); this.setupSkipExportForm(expenseFiltersGet, expenseFilterCondition); this.setupFormWatchers(); this.isLoading = false; }); } private setupAdvancedSettingsForm(advancedSettingResponse: any, expenseFiltersGet: any, adminEmails: any): void { const isSkipExportEnabled = expenseFiltersGet.count > 0; this.advancedSettingForm = QBOAdvancedSettingModel.mapAPIResponseToFormGroup(advancedSettingResponse, isSkipExportEnabled, adminEmails); } private setupSkipExportForm(expenseFiltersGet: any, expenseFilterCondition: any): void { this.skipExportForm = SkipExportModel.setupSkipExportForm(expenseFiltersGet, [], expenseFilterCondition); } private setupFormWatchers(): void { this.createMemoStructureWatcher(); QBOAdvancedSettingModel.setConfigurationSettingValidatorsAndWatchers(this.advancedSettingForm); this.skipExportWatcher(); }This refactoring separates the concerns of setting up different forms and watchers, making the code more modular and easier to understand.
src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite-shared/netsuite-advanced-settings/netsuite-advanced-settings.component.ts (1)
112-115: Consider a more descriptive method name.The
invalidSkipExportFormmethod is correctly implemented to update the form's validity state. However, consider renaming it to something more descriptive likeupdateSkipExportFormValidityto better reflect its purpose.- invalidSkipExportForm($event: boolean) { + updateSkipExportFormValidity($event: boolean) { this.isSkipExportFormInvalid = $event; }src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite-shared/netsuite-advanced-settings/netsuite-advanced-settings.component.html (2)
152-153: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the
(invalidSkipExportForm)event binding is a good improvement for handling invalid skip export form states. This will allow the parent component to react to validation issues in the skip export form.Consider adding a brief comment above these event bindings to explain their purpose, especially if the
invalidSkipExportFormmethod in the component file has complex logic. For example:<!-- Handle skip export form events --> (deleteSkipExportForm)="deleteExpenseFilter($event)" (invalidSkipExportForm)="invalidSkipExportForm($event)"This can help other developers quickly understand the purpose of these event bindings.
250-250: LGTM! Consider improving readability.The update to the
isButtonDisabledproperty is a good improvement. It now considers both the main form's validity and the skip export form's validity when determining whether the button should be disabled.To improve readability, especially if more conditions are added in the future, consider breaking the condition into multiple lines:
[isButtonDisabled]=" !advancedSettingForm.valid || isSkipExportFormInvalid "This format makes it easier to read and maintain, especially if more conditions are added in the future.
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-advanced-settings/intacct-advanced-settings.component.ts (4)
31-31: Consider initializing theisSkipExportFormInvalidpropertyIt's a good practice to initialize boolean properties. Consider initializing
isSkipExportFormInvalidtofalseortruebased on your default form state expectations.- isSkipExportFormInvalid: boolean; + isSkipExportFormInvalid: boolean = false; // or true, depending on your default state
133-135: Method implementation looks good, consider a more descriptive nameThe implementation of
invalidSkipExportFormis correct. However, consider renaming it to something more descriptive likeupdateSkipExportFormValidityto better reflect its purpose.- invalidSkipExportForm($event: boolean) { + updateSkipExportFormValidity($event: boolean) { this.isSkipExportFormInvalid = $event; }
Line range hint
286-298: Good implementation, consider using FormBuilder for consistencyThe
initializeSkipExportFormmethod correctly sets up theskipExportForm. For consistency with other form initializations in this component (likeadvancedSettingsForm), consider usingFormBuilderhere as well.- private initializeSkipExportForm(): void { - this.skipExportForm = this.formBuilder.group({ + private initializeSkipExportForm(): void { + this.skipExportForm = this.formBuilder.group({ condition1: [''], operator1: [''], value1: [['']], customFieldType1: [''], join_by: [''], condition2: [''], operator2: [''], value2: [['']], customFieldType2: [''] }); }
Line range hint
300-302: Good addition, consider adding form validationThe
updateFormmethod provides a clean way to update theskipExportForm. To enhance robustness, consider adding validation to ensure the incoming form has the expected structure.updateForm(updatedForm: FormGroup) { + if (this.isValidSkipExportForm(updatedForm)) { this.skipExportForm = updatedForm; + } else { + console.error('Invalid form structure provided to updateForm'); + } } + private isValidSkipExportForm(form: FormGroup): boolean { + const expectedControls = ['condition1', 'operator1', 'value1', 'customFieldType1', 'join_by', 'condition2', 'operator2', 'value2', 'customFieldType2']; + return expectedControls.every(control => form.contains(control)); + }src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-advanced-settings/intacct-advanced-settings.component.html (2)
136-137: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the
invalidSkipExportFormevent binding is a good practice for handling form validation events. It allows the parent component to react when the skip export form becomes invalid, which can improve user experience and data integrity.Consider adding a brief comment above this line to explain the purpose of this event binding, for example:
<!-- Handle invalid skip export form state --> <app-skip-export ... (invalidSkipExportForm)="invalidSkipExportForm($event)"> </app-skip-export>
242-242: LGTM! Consider refactoring for improved readability.The addition of
isSkipExportFormInvalidto theisButtonDisabledcondition is consistent with the newly added event binding and ensures that the button remains disabled when the skip export form is invalid. This change improves the overall form validation logic.The condition for
isButtonDisabledis becoming quite complex. Consider refactoring it into a separate method in the component's TypeScript file for improved readability and maintainability. For example:isFooterButtonDisabled(): boolean { return this.isSkipExportFormInvalid || !this.advancedSettingsForm.valid || (this.advancedSettingsForm.get('skipSelectiveExpenses')?.value && !this.skipExportForm.valid); }Then, in the template:
<app-configuration-step-footer ... [isButtonDisabled]="isFooterButtonDisabled()" ... ></app-configuration-step-footer>This refactoring would make the template cleaner and the logic easier to understand and modify in the future.
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-c1-import-settings/intacct-c1-import-settings.component.ts (1)
195-197: LGTM! Consider resetting all form controls consistently.The addition of resetting the
source_fieldto null is a good practice to ensure a clean state when closing the modal. This prevents any residual data from affecting subsequent operations.For consistency, consider resetting all form controls in the
customFieldControlto their initial state. You could use thereset()method on the entire form control:closeModel() { - this.customFieldControl.patchValue({ - source_field: null - }); + this.customFieldControl.reset(); this.customFieldForm.reset(); this.showDialog = false; }This ensures that all fields within
customFieldControlare reset, not just thesource_field.src/app/shared/components/si/helper/skip-export/skip-export.component.ts (1)
7-7: New dependency introduced: @rxweb/reactive-form-validatorsThe addition of RxwebValidators introduces a new dependency to the project. While this library provides useful validators, it's important to ensure that it's properly documented in the project's dependencies and that all team members are aware of its introduction.
Consider adding a comment explaining why this specific library was chosen over Angular's built-in validators, and update the project's documentation to reflect this new dependency.
src/app/integrations/sage300/sage300-shared/sage300-import-settings/sage300-import-settings.component.ts (4)
Line range hint
150-161: Verify arrays are not empty before usingpop()In the
saveDependentCustomField()method,pop()is called oncostCodeFieldOptionandcostCategoryOptionwithout checking if the arrays are non-empty. If these arrays are ever empty, callingpop()could result inundefined, leading to unexpected behavior. Ensure the arrays have elements before callingpop().Consider modifying the code as follows:
if (this.customFieldType === 'costCodes') { + if (this.costCodeFieldOption.length > 0) { this.costCodeFieldOption.pop(); + } this.costCodeFieldOption.push(this.customField); this.costCodeFieldOption.push(this.customFieldOption[0]); } else { + if (this.costCategoryOption.length > 0) { this.costCategoryOption.pop(); + } this.costCategoryOption.push(this.customField); this.costCategoryOption.push(this.customFieldOption[0]); }
Line range hint
235-240: Add validation todisplay_nameif it is requiredIn the
initializeCustomFieldForm()method, thedisplay_namecontrol is created without any validators. Ifdisplay_nameis a required field for the custom field form, consider addingValidators.requiredto ensure form validity before submission.Apply this diff to include the validator:
this.customFieldForm = this.formBuilder.group({ attribute_type: ['', Validators.required], - display_name: [''], + display_name: ['', Validators.required], source_placeholder: ['', Validators.required] });
Line range hint
184-218: Unsubscribe fromvalueChangessubscriptions to prevent memory leaksMultiple subscriptions to
valueChangesare established in methods likedependentCostFieldsWatchers(),dependentFieldWatchers(), andimportSettingWatcher()without being unsubscribed. This can lead to memory leaks if the component is destroyed and the subscriptions persist. Implement theOnDestroyinterface and unsubscribe from these observables in thengOnDestroy()method or use thetakeUntiloperator with aSubject.Example using
OnDestroyandSubject:import { Subject } from 'rxjs'; export class Sage300ImportSettingsComponent implements OnInit, OnDestroy { private destroy$ = new Subject<void>(); // ... existing code ... private dependentCostFieldsWatchers(formControllerName: string): void { this.importSettingForm.controls[formControllerName].valueChanges .pipe(takeUntil(this.destroy$)) .subscribe((value) => { // subscription code }); } // ... similarly update other subscriptions ... ngOnDestroy(): void { this.destroy$.next(); this.destroy$.complete(); } }
Line range hint
390-404: Handle errors from all observables inforkJoinIn the
setupPage()method,forkJoinis used to combine multiple observables, but onlygetSage300ImportSettings()has error handling withcatchError(). If any of the other observables fail, the entireforkJoinwill error out, and subsequent initialization code will not execute. Consider adding error handling for each observable to ensure the component initializes correctly even if some requests fail.Modify the code as follows to handle errors for each observable:
forkJoin([ - this.importSettingService.getSage300ImportSettings().pipe(catchError(() => of(null))), - this.mappingService.getFyleFields(), - this.mappingService.getIntegrationsFields(AppNameInService.SAGE300), - this.importSettingService.getImportCodeFieldConfig() + this.importSettingService.getSage300ImportSettings().pipe(catchError(() => of(null))), + this.mappingService.getFyleFields().pipe(catchError(() => of([]))), + this.mappingService.getIntegrationsFields(AppNameInService.SAGE300).pipe(catchError(() => of([]))), + this.importSettingService.getImportCodeFieldConfig().pipe(catchError(() => of({}))) ]).subscribe( /* ... */ );src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-import-settings/intacct-import-settings.component.ts (1)
343-344: Reduce code duplication by moving 'patchValue(null)' calls outside the conditionThe calls to
patchValue(null)for bothcostCodesandcostTypesare duplicated in both theifandelseblocks within thecostCodesCostTypesWatchermethod. To enhance maintainability and readability, consider moving these calls outside the conditional statement.Refactored code:
this.importSettingsForm.controls.isDependentImportEnabled.valueChanges.subscribe((isDependentImportEnabled) => { + this.importSettingsForm.controls.costCodes.patchValue(null); + this.importSettingsForm.controls.costTypes.patchValue(null); if (isDependentImportEnabled) { - this.importSettingsForm.controls.costCodes.patchValue(null); - this.importSettingsForm.controls.costTypes.patchValue(null); this.importSettingsForm.controls.costCodes.enable(); this.importSettingsForm.controls.costTypes.enable(); this.importSettingsForm.controls.costCodes.setValidators(Validators.required); this.importSettingsForm.controls.costTypes.setValidators(Validators.required); } else { - this.importSettingsForm.controls.costCodes.patchValue(null); - this.importSettingsForm.controls.costTypes.patchValue(null); this.importSettingsForm.controls.costCodes.disable(); this.importSettingsForm.controls.costTypes.disable(); this.importSettingsForm.controls.costCodes.clearValidators(); this.importSettingsForm.controls.costTypes.clearValidators(); } });Also applies to: 350-351
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
- src/app/integrations/business-central/business-central-shared/business-central-advanced-settings/business-central-advanced-settings.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/business-central/business-central-shared/business-central-advanced-settings/business-central-advanced-settings.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-advanced-settings/intacct-advanced-settings.component.html (2 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-advanced-settings/intacct-advanced-settings.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-c1-import-settings/intacct-c1-import-settings.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-import-settings/intacct-import-settings.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite-shared/netsuite-advanced-settings/netsuite-advanced-settings.component.html (2 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite-shared/netsuite-advanced-settings/netsuite-advanced-settings.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-shared/qbo-advanced-settings/qbo-advanced-settings.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-shared/qbo-advanced-settings/qbo-advanced-settings.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/sage300/sage300-shared/sage300-advanced-settings/sage300-advanced-settings.component.html (2 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/sage300/sage300-shared/sage300-advanced-settings/sage300-advanced-settings.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/sage300/sage300-shared/sage300-import-settings/sage300-import-settings.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/xero/xero-onboarding/xero-clone-settings/xero-clone-settings.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/app/shared/components/configuration/configuration-skip-export/configuration-skip-export.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/app/shared/components/si/helper/skip-export/skip-export.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/app/shared/components/si/helper/skip-export/skip-export.component.ts (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (28)
src/app/integrations/sage300/sage300-shared/sage300-advanced-settings/sage300-advanced-settings.component.html (1)
Line range hint
1-100: Overall, the changes improve form validation handling.The modifications to this template enhance the skip export form validation process and ensure better consistency in the UI state. The addition of the
invalidSkipExportFormevent binding and the update to theisButtonDisabledcondition work together to provide a more robust form handling mechanism.While the changes are good as they are, consider the minor suggestions provided in the previous comments to further refine the code:
- Clarify the method name for the
invalidSkipExportFormevent handler.- Optimize the order of conditions in the
isButtonDisabledproperty.These small adjustments could improve code readability and potentially optimize performance.
src/app/integrations/business-central/business-central-shared/business-central-advanced-settings/business-central-advanced-settings.component.html (1)
98-98: LGTM! Verify thegetSkipExportValue()method.The addition of
isSkipExportFormInvalidto theisButtonDisabledcondition enhances form validation, preventing actions when the skip export form is invalid. This change aligns well with the PR's objective of fixing form value bugs.To ensure the
getSkipExportValue()method is correctly implemented and used, please run the following verification script:This will help ensure that the
getSkipExportValue()method is correctly implemented and consistently used throughout the component.✅ Verification successful
Verified the
getSkipExportValue()method implementation.The
getSkipExportValue()method is correctly implemented in thebusiness-central-advanced-settings.component.tsfile, ensuring that theisButtonDisabledbinding accurately reflects the form's validity. This change effectively prevents actions when the skip export form is invalid, aligning with the PR's objective of fixing form value bugs.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of getSkipExportValue() method # Test: Search for the getSkipExportValue method definition echo "Searching for getSkipExportValue method definition:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'getSkipExportValue() { $$$ }' # Test: Search for other usages of getSkipExportValue method echo "Searching for other usages of getSkipExportValue method:" rg --type typescript 'getSkipExportValue\(\)'Length of output: 843
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the implementation and usage of getSkipExportValue() method with corrected commands # Test: Search for the getSkipExportValue method definition echo "Searching for getSkipExportValue method definition:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern ' class $_ { $$$ getSkipExportValue() { $$$ } $$$ } ' # Test: Search for other usages of getSkipExportValue method echo "Searching for other usages of getSkipExportValue method:" rg --type ts 'getSkipExportValue\(\)'Length of output: 698
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Further verify the implementation of getSkipExportValue() method without class encapsulation # Test: Search for the getSkipExportValue method definition without specifying the class echo "Searching for getSkipExportValue method definition without class context:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'function getSkipExportValue($_) { $$$ }' # Test: Display the implementation of getSkipExportValue in business-central-advanced-settings.component.ts echo "Displaying implementation of getSkipExportValue in business-central-advanced-settings.component.ts:" cat src/app/integrations/business-central/business-central-shared/business-central-advanced-settings/business-central-advanced-settings.component.ts | grep -A 5 'getSkipExportValue'Length of output: 1295
src/app/shared/components/si/helper/skip-export/skip-export.component.html (1)
Line range hint
1-124: Summary: Form validation improvements align with PR objectivesThe changes made in this file, particularly the addition of the distinct condition validation error message, align well with the PR objective of fixing form value bugs. The new validation improves the user experience by providing more specific feedback and preventing invalid form submissions.
The suggestions provided for accessibility improvements will further enhance the usability of the form, especially for users relying on assistive technologies.
Overall, these changes contribute positively to the form's functionality and user experience.
src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-shared/qbo-advanced-settings/qbo-advanced-settings.component.html (3)
156-163: Summary: Improved form validation for skip export functionalityThe changes in this file focus on enhancing the form validation process, particularly for the skip export feature. The addition of the
invalidSkipExportFormevent binding and the update to theisButtonDisabledcondition work together to ensure that the form can't be submitted unless all parts, including the skip export form, are valid. This improvement enhances data integrity and user experience.These changes align well with the PR objective of fixing form value bugs. To ensure full implementation:
- Verify the
invalidSkipExportFormmethod in the TypeScript file.- Confirm the correct implementation and updating of the
isSkipExportFormInvalidproperty.- Test the skip export functionality to ensure it behaves as expected with these new validation checks.
163-163: LGTM! Verify the isSkipExportFormInvalid property.The update to the
isButtonDisabledcondition enhances the form validation by including the skip export form's validity. This ensures that the user can't proceed if any part of the form is invalid, improving data integrity.Please confirm that the
isSkipExportFormInvalidproperty is correctly implemented and updated in the component's TypeScript file. Run the following script to verify:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of isSkipExportFormInvalid property # Test: Search for the isSkipExportFormInvalid property in the component's TypeScript file rg --type typescript -g '*qbo-advanced-settings.component.ts' 'isSkipExportFormInvalid'
156-156: LGTM! Verify the corresponding TypeScript implementation.The addition of the
(invalidSkipExportForm)event binding improves the component's ability to handle invalid skip export forms. This change enhances the overall form validation process.Please ensure that the
invalidSkipExportForm($event)method is properly implemented in the corresponding TypeScript file. Run the following script to verify:✅ Verification successful
Verified the implementation of
invalidSkipExportFormmethod in the corresponding TypeScript file.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of invalidSkipExportForm method # Test: Search for the invalidSkipExportForm method in the component's TypeScript file rg --type typescript -g '*qbo-advanced-settings.component.ts' 'invalidSkipExportForm\s*\('Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of invalidSkipExportForm method # Search for the invalidSkipExportForm method in the component's TypeScript file rg -g '*qbo-advanced-settings.component.ts' 'invalidSkipExportForm\s*\('Length of output: 210
src/app/integrations/business-central/business-central-shared/business-central-advanced-settings/business-central-advanced-settings.component.ts (2)
62-62: LGTM: New property for tracking skip export form validity.The addition of
isSkipExportFormInvalidis a good practice for managing form state. It will likely be used to control UI elements or form submission based on the skip export form's validity.
Line range hint
62-77: Verify usage of new property and method.The new
isSkipExportFormInvalidproperty andinvalidSkipExportFormmethod have been added to enhance form state management. However, their usage is not evident within this component.Please ensure that:
- The
isSkipExportFormInvalidproperty is being used in the component's template or in other methods to control UI elements or form submission.- The
invalidSkipExportFormmethod is properly bound to form validity changes, likely in the component's template.You can verify this by checking the corresponding HTML template file and any parent components that might be interacting with this component. Run the following script to check for usage:
✅ Verification successful
Usage of new property and method verified.
The
isSkipExportFormInvalidproperty andinvalidSkipExportFormmethod are utilized in the component's HTML template. No additional usages found in the TypeScript codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of isSkipExportFormInvalid and invalidSkipExportForm # Search for isSkipExportFormInvalid in HTML files echo "Searching for isSkipExportFormInvalid usage in HTML files:" rg --type html "isSkipExportFormInvalid" src/app/integrations/business-central # Search for invalidSkipExportForm in HTML files echo "Searching for invalidSkipExportForm usage in HTML files:" rg --type html "invalidSkipExportForm" src/app/integrations/business-central # Search for isSkipExportFormInvalid in TS files (excluding the current file) echo "Searching for isSkipExportFormInvalid usage in TS files:" rg --type typescript "isSkipExportFormInvalid" src/app/integrations/business-central | grep -v "business-central-advanced-settings.component.ts" # Search for invalidSkipExportForm in TS files (excluding the current file) echo "Searching for invalidSkipExportForm usage in TS files:" rg --type typescript "invalidSkipExportForm" src/app/integrations/business-central | grep -v "business-central-advanced-settings.component.ts"Length of output: 1517
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Corrected script to check for usage of isSkipExportFormInvalid and invalidSkipExportForm # Search for isSkipExportFormInvalid in HTML files echo "Searching for isSkipExportFormInvalid usage in HTML files:" rg --type html "isSkipExportFormInvalid" src/app/integrations/business-central # Search for invalidSkipExportForm in HTML files echo "Searching for invalidSkipExportForm usage in HTML files:" rg --type html "invalidSkipExportForm" src/app/integrations/business-central # Search for isSkipExportFormInvalid in TS files (excluding the current file) echo "Searching for isSkipExportFormInvalid usage in TS files:" rg --type ts "isSkipExportFormInvalid" src/app/integrations/business-central | grep -v "business-central-advanced-settings.component.ts" # Search for invalidSkipExportForm in TS files (excluding the current file) echo "Searching for invalidSkipExportForm usage in TS files:" rg --type ts "invalidSkipExportForm" src/app/integrations/business-central | grep -v "business-central-advanced-settings.component.ts"Length of output: 1431
src/app/integrations/sage300/sage300-shared/sage300-advanced-settings/sage300-advanced-settings.component.ts (3)
71-72: LGTM: New property for tracking skip export form validity.The addition of
isSkipExportFormInvalidis a good practice. It allows for easy tracking of the skip export form's validity state, which can be used to control UI elements or form submission.
Line range hint
275-277: LGTM: Improved form validation before saving.The changes in the
savemethod are well-implemented. Checking the validity of bothadvancedSettingFormandskipExportFormbefore proceeding with the save operation ensures that only valid data is processed. This is a good practice that helps prevent potential issues with invalid data being saved.
Line range hint
1-285: Overall assessment: Improved form handling and data validation.The changes in this file generally enhance the robustness of the Sage300AdvancedSettingsComponent by improving form handling and data validation. The addition of the
isSkipExportFormInvalidproperty and corresponding update method, along with the enhanced validation checks in thesaveandconstructPayloadAndSavemethods, contribute to a more reliable data saving process.While there are minor suggestions for improvement (such as method naming and potential refactoring for better separation of concerns), the overall changes are positive and align well with good coding practices.
src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-shared/qbo-advanced-settings/qbo-advanced-settings.component.ts (2)
80-81: LGTM: New property for form validation.The addition of
isSkipExportFormInvalidis a good practice for tracking the validity state of the skip export form.
Line range hint
1-255: Summary: Changes address form value bugs with room for improvementThe changes in this file successfully integrate skip export functionality into the advanced settings component, addressing the PR objective of fixing form value bugs. The new property
isSkipExportFormInvalidand the methodinvalidSkipExportForm(which could be renamed for clarity) provide a mechanism to track and update the skip export form's validity.The
getSettingsAndSetupFormmethod has been expanded to include setup for both advanced settings and skip export functionality. While this implementation works, it could benefit from refactoring to improve modularity and maintainability.Overall, the changes meet the PR objectives, but there's room for improvement in code organization and naming conventions.
To ensure that these changes don't introduce any regressions, please run the following verification script:
This script will help verify the presence of the new skip export functionality and highlight any potential issues or incomplete implementations.
✅ Verification successful
✅ Verification Successful: Skip Export Functionality Integrated Correctly
The skip export functionality has been successfully integrated into the advanced settings component. All related properties and methods are present, the form setup is correctly implemented, and there are no outstanding TODOs.
isSkipExportFormInvalidproperty is defined and utilized.invalidSkipExportFormmethod is present and functioning.skipExportFormis properly set up in thegetSettingsAndSetupFormmethod.- No TODO comments detected, ensuring no incomplete implementations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of skip export functionality # Test 1: Check for the presence of skip export related properties and methods echo "Checking for skip export related code..." grep -n "isSkipExportFormInvalid" src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-shared/qbo-advanced-settings/qbo-advanced-settings.component.ts grep -n "invalidSkipExportForm" src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-shared/qbo-advanced-settings/qbo-advanced-settings.component.ts # Test 2: Verify the setup of skip export form in getSettingsAndSetupForm method echo "Verifying skip export form setup..." sed -n '/getSettingsAndSetupForm/,/^ }/p' src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-shared/qbo-advanced-settings/qbo-advanced-settings.component.ts | grep "skipExportForm" # Test 3: Check for any TODO comments that might indicate incomplete implementation echo "Checking for TODO comments..." grep -n "TODO" src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-shared/qbo-advanced-settings/qbo-advanced-settings.component.ts echo "Verification complete. Please review the output to ensure all expected changes are present and there are no outstanding TODOs."Length of output: 1273
src/app/shared/components/configuration/configuration-skip-export/configuration-skip-export.component.ts (1)
26-27: LGTM: New output event emitter addedThe addition of the
invalidSkipExportFormoutput event emitter is a good improvement. It allows the component to communicate the validity state of the skip export form to its parent component, enhancing the overall form validation process.src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite-shared/netsuite-advanced-settings/netsuite-advanced-settings.component.ts (2)
94-95: LGTM: New property for form validation.The addition of
isSkipExportFormInvalidproperty is a good practice for tracking the validity state of the skip export form. It follows Angular naming conventions and is correctly typed as a boolean.
Line range hint
94-115: Verify usage of new property and method.The new
isSkipExportFormInvalidproperty andinvalidSkipExportFormmethod have been added, but their usage is not visible in the provided TypeScript file. Please ensure that these are properly utilized in the component's template or in other parts of the component to avoid dead code.To verify the usage, you can run the following command:
✅ Verification successful
Usage of
isSkipExportFormInvalidandinvalidSkipExportFormconfirmed in component template.
isSkipExportFormInvalidis used innetsuite-advanced-settings.component.htmlto control button disablement.invalidSkipExportFormmethod is invoked innetsuite-advanced-settings.component.htmlupon form invalidation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of isSkipExportFormInvalid and invalidSkipExportForm in the component's template and TypeScript files echo "Searching for isSkipExportFormInvalid usage:" rg --type html 'isSkipExportFormInvalid' src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite-shared/netsuite-advanced-settings/ echo "Searching for invalidSkipExportForm usage:" rg --type html 'invalidSkipExportForm' src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite-shared/netsuite-advanced-settings/ echo "Searching for other potential uses in TypeScript files:" rg --type typescript '(isSkipExportFormInvalid|invalidSkipExportForm)' src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite-shared/netsuite-advanced-settings/Length of output: 1118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of isSkipExportFormInvalid and invalidSkipExportForm in the component's template and TypeScript files echo "Searching for isSkipExportFormInvalid usage in HTML:" rg --type html 'isSkipExportFormInvalid' src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite-shared/netsuite-advanced-settings/ echo "Searching for invalidSkipExportForm usage in HTML:" rg --type html 'invalidSkipExportForm' src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite-shared/netsuite-advanced-settings/ echo "Searching for isSkipExportFormInvalid and invalidSkipExportForm usage in TypeScript files:" rg --type ts '(isSkipExportFormInvalid|invalidSkipExportForm)' src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite-shared/netsuite-advanced-settings/Length of output: 1638
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-advanced-settings/intacct-advanced-settings.component.html (1)
Line range hint
1-244: Overall, the changes improve form validation handling.The modifications to this file enhance the skip export form validation process by adding an event binding for invalid form states and incorporating this validation into the footer button's disabled state. These changes are consistent and improve the overall functionality of the component.
While no major issues were found, consider implementing the suggested improvements for code clarity and maintainability:
- Adding a comment to explain the purpose of the
invalidSkipExportFormevent binding.- Refactoring the complex
isButtonDisabledcondition into a separate method in the component's TypeScript file.These minor adjustments will make the code more readable and easier to maintain in the future.
src/app/shared/components/si/helper/skip-export/skip-export.component.ts (5)
22-23: LGTM: New output event for form validityThe addition of
invalidSkipExportFormoutput is a good way to communicate the form's validity state to the parent component. This enhances the component's reusability and allows for better control in the parent component.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this output, e.g.:
// Emits true if the skip export form is invalid, false otherwise @Output() invalidSkipExportForm = new EventEmitter<boolean>();
260-267: LGTM: Improved validation logicThe changes to
checkValidationConditionmethod improve the validation logic by ensuring that the two conditions are not the same when an additional condition is shown. The use of the newinvalidSkipExportFormoutput is correct and aligns with the component's enhanced functionality.Consider simplifying the return statement:
this.invalidSkipExportForm.emit(isInvalid); return isInvalid;This would make the code more DRY and easier to maintain.
Line range hint
232-237: LGTM: Enhanced validation for additional filterThe addition of
RxwebValidators.unique()to the validators forcondition2is a good way to ensure that the second condition is different from the first. This aligns well with the validation logic in thecheckValidationConditionmethod.Consider adding a comment to explain the purpose of the unique validator:
// Ensure that condition2 is different from condition1 this.skipExportForm.controls.condition2.setValidators([Validators.required, RxwebValidators.unique()]);This will help other developers understand the reasoning behind using this specific validator.
Line range hint
574-580: LGTM: Consistent validation setupThe addition of
RxwebValidators.unique()to the validators forcondition2in thesetupSkipExportFormmethod is consistent with the earlier change inupdateAdditionalFilterVisibility. This ensures that the unique validation is applied when the form is initially set up.For consistency, consider adding a similar comment here as suggested for the
updateAdditionalFilterVisibilitymethod:// Ensure that condition2 is different from condition1 this.skipExportForm.controls.condition2.setValidators([Validators.required, RxwebValidators.unique()]);This maintains consistency in code documentation across the component.
Line range hint
1-594: Overall assessment: Good improvements with minor suggestionsThe changes to this component enhance its form validation capabilities and improve communication with the parent component. The introduction of the
RxwebValidatorsand the newinvalidSkipExportFormoutput event are positive additions that increase the component's functionality and reusability.Key points:
- The new dependency (@rxweb/reactive-form-validators) should be documented at the project level.
- The validation logic is more robust, ensuring unique conditions when multiple filters are used.
- The component now effectively communicates its form validity state to the parent.
Suggestions for further improvement:
- Add comments to explain the purpose of the new validators and output event.
- Maintain consistency in code documentation across the component.
- Consider simplifying the return statement in the
checkValidationConditionmethod.Overall, these changes represent a solid improvement to the component's functionality and maintainability.
src/app/integrations/xero/xero-onboarding/xero-clone-settings/xero-clone-settings.component.html (5)
Line range hint
1-131: LGTM! Improved form dynamics and data display.The changes in the export settings section enhance the user experience by providing more dynamic form behavior based on user selections. The modification of
dropdownDisplayKeyfrom 'value' to 'name' for the bank account field suggests an improvement in how data is displayed in the dropdown, likely making it more user-friendly.
Line range hint
132-220: LGTM! Enhanced import flexibility.The import settings section now includes a new conditional rendering for importing suppliers as merchants, which adds flexibility to the import process. This change, along with the use of the custom
app-configuration-import-fieldcomponent, suggests a modular and adaptable approach to handling import configurations.
Line range hint
221-362: LGTM! Improved payment synchronization options.The advanced settings section now includes a new field for selecting a bill payment account, which provides more granular control over payment synchronization. This addition, along with the existing options for automatic export and error notifications, offers comprehensive configuration capabilities for advanced users.
Line range hint
363-385: LGTM! Well-structured footer with appropriate validations.The footer section is well-implemented, using the custom
app-configuration-step-footercomponent. The save button is correctly disabled based on the validity of multiple forms, ensuring data integrity. The inclusion of dialog components for warnings and custom field creation enhances the user experience by providing clear feedback and interaction points.
Line range hint
1-385: LGTM! Well-structured and user-friendly template.Overall, the changes to this template file significantly improve the Xero clone settings component. The consistent use of custom components, effective conditional rendering, and logical organization of different settings sections (export, import, and advanced) create a user-friendly and maintainable template. The additions and modifications enhance the flexibility and granularity of the configuration options, providing a comprehensive setup process for users.
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-import-settings/intacct-import-settings.component.ts (1)
353-353: Ensure 'costCodes' control is disabled consistentlyIn the
elseblock of thecostCodesCostTypesWatchermethod, bothcostCodesandcostTypescontrols should be disabled. Confirm thatthis.importSettingsForm.controls.costCodes.disable();is correctly called to prevent inconsistencies.Run the following script to verify the presence of the disable call:
✅ Verification successful
'costCodes' control is correctly disabled in the else block
The
this.importSettingsForm.controls.costCodes.disable();call is present in the else block, ensuring consistent disabling of thecostCodescontrol.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'costCodes.disable();' is called in the 'else' block. # Test: Search for 'costCodes.disable();' in the specified method. rg --pcre2 --multiline --type typescript 'else\s*{\s*(?:.*\s)*?this\.importSettingsForm\.controls\.costCodes\.disable\(\);' src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-import-settings/intacct-import-settings.component.tsLength of output: 265
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'costCodes.disable();' is called in the 'else' block. # Test: Search for 'costCodes.disable();' in the specified method using the correct file type. rg --pcre2 --multiline --type ts 'else\s*{\s*(?:.*\s)*?this\.importSettingsForm\.controls\.costCodes\.disable\(\);' src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-import-settings/intacct-import-settings.component.tsLength of output: 372
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'costCodes.disable();' is called in the 'else' block using ast-grep. # Test: Search for 'costCodes.disable();' within an 'else' block in the specified TypeScript file. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'if ($_) { $$$ } else { $$$ this.importSettingsForm.controls.costCodes.disable(); $$$ }' src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-import-settings/intacct-import-settings.component.tsLength of output: 2764
| this.invalidSkipExportForm.emit(true); | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| this.invalidSkipExportForm.emit(false); | ||
| return false; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review the logic in checkValidationCondition method
The current implementation of checkValidationCondition seems to have a logical issue:
- It emits
true(indicating an invalid form) when both conditions are valid and have the samefield_name. - It emits
false(indicating a valid form) in all other cases.
This logic appears counterintuitive. Typically, we would expect the form to be considered invalid when conditions are not met, rather than when they are. Please review and clarify if this is the intended behavior.
Consider revising the logic to align with expected form validation behavior. For example:
checkValidationCondition() {
const condition1 = this.skipExportForm.controls.condition1;
const condition2 = this.skipExportForm.controls.condition2;
if (this.showAdditionalCondition) {
if (condition1.valid && condition2.valid) {
if (condition1.value?.field_name === condition2.value?.field_name) {
this.invalidSkipExportForm.emit(false);
return false; // Form is valid when conditions are different
}
}
}
this.invalidSkipExportForm.emit(true);
return true; // Form is invalid in other cases
}Please review and adjust according to the intended validation logic.
| this.customFieldControl.patchValue({ | ||
| source_field: null | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure customFieldControl is initialized before usage
In the closeModel() method, this.customFieldControl might be undefined if it hasn't been initialized, which could lead to runtime errors. Consider adding a null check before calling patchValue() to prevent potential issues.
Apply this diff to add a null check:
closeModel() {
+ if (this.customFieldControl) {
this.customFieldControl.patchValue({
source_field: null
});
+ }
this.customFieldForm.reset();
this.showCustomFieldDialog = false;
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| this.customFieldControl.patchValue({ | ||
| source_field: null | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add null check for 'customFieldControl' before calling 'patchValue'
In the closeModel() method, ensure that this.customFieldControl is not null or undefined before calling patchValue to prevent potential runtime errors.
Consider updating the code as follows:
+ if (this.customFieldControl) {
this.customFieldControl.patchValue({
source_field: null
});
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.customFieldControl.patchValue({ | |
| source_field: null | |
| }); | |
| if (this.customFieldControl) { | |
| this.customFieldControl.patchValue({ | |
| source_field: null | |
| }); | |
| } |
| this.importSettingsForm.controls.costCodes.patchValue(null); | ||
| this.importSettingsForm.controls.costTypes.patchValue(null); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is common for if and else, move it out
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/app/core/models/common/advanced-settings.model.ts (1)
192-192: Approve the case-insensitive comparison and suggest a minor optimization.The change to use case-insensitive comparison for
field_nameis a good improvement. It will make the condition field matching more robust and aligns with the PR objective of fixing bugs.However, consider using
findinstead offilterif you expect only one match:const selectedConditionOption = conditionFieldOptions?.find((fieldOption) => fieldOption.field_name.toLowerCase() === element.condition.toLowerCase()); if (selectedConditionOption) { conditionArray.push(selectedConditionOption); }This change would:
- Improve performance by stopping the search once a match is found.
- Ensure only one condition is added per element, preventing potential duplicates.
- Make the code's intent clearer if you indeed expect only one match per condition.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- src/app/core/models/common/advanced-settings.model.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-import-settings/intacct-import-settings.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite-shared/netsuite-advanced-settings/netsuite-advanced-settings.component.html (2 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite-shared/netsuite-advanced-settings/netsuite-advanced-settings.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/app/shared/components/configuration/configuration-skip-export/configuration-skip-export.component.ts (4 hunks)
- src/app/shared/components/si/helper/skip-export/skip-export.component.ts (7 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-import-settings/intacct-import-settings.component.ts
- src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite-shared/netsuite-advanced-settings/netsuite-advanced-settings.component.html
- src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite-shared/netsuite-advanced-settings/netsuite-advanced-settings.component.ts
- src/app/shared/components/configuration/configuration-skip-export/configuration-skip-export.component.ts
- src/app/shared/components/si/helper/skip-export/skip-export.component.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/app/core/models/common/advanced-settings.model.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-365: Overall assessment of the changesThe modification in the
setConditionFieldsmethod improves the robustness of condition field matching by introducing case-insensitive comparison. This change aligns well with the PR objective of fixing bugs and is a focused improvement that doesn't introduce significant risks.The rest of the file remains unchanged, maintaining the existing functionality of advanced settings and skip export features. The change is well-integrated and doesn't affect the overall structure or behavior of the classes and interfaces defined in this file.
Description
fix: fixing the bugs reported
Clickup
Please add link here
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
These updates ensure a more robust and user-friendly experience when using the skip export functionality.