test: intacct advanced settings utility functions #1027
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the test suite for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.fixture.ts (2)
954-981: Consider adjusting the interval_hours valueThe
advancedSettingsconstant provides a comprehensive set of mock data. However, theinterval_hoursvalue of 12 might not be realistic for most use cases. Consider using a more common value, such as 24 (daily) or 168 (weekly), to better reflect typical synchronization intervals.
1004-1017: Improve naming for clarityThe configuration constants provide clear mock data for different synchronization scenarios. However, the name of the last constant
configurationWithOutSynccould be improved for better clarity.Consider renaming it to
configurationWithoutSyncorconfigurationWithNoSyncto make it more immediately clear that it represents a configuration with no synchronization enabled.src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-advanced-settings/intacct-advanced-settings.component.spec.ts (1)
220-221: Provide more descriptive error messages in tests.Currently, the mocked error message is generic (
'Error'). Providing more descriptive error messages can improve test clarity and debugging.Consider updating the error message:
-const getError = () => new Error('Error'); +const getError = () => new Error('Failed to save advanced settings');
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-advanced-settings/intacct-advanced-settings.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.fixture.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.fixture.ts (2)
949-952: LGTM: adminEmails constant looks goodThe
adminEmailsconstant is correctly defined as an array ofQBDEmailOptions. It provides a good set of mock data for testing purposes.
949-1017: Overall assessment: Good additions with room for minor improvementsThe new constants added to this fixture file provide valuable mock data for testing various scenarios in the Intacct integration. The additions cover admin emails, advanced settings, expense filters, grouped attributes, and different configuration scenarios.
While the overall structure and content are good, there are a few areas for improvement:
- Consider adjusting the
interval_hoursinadvancedSettingsto a more realistic value.- The
expenseFiltercould be expanded to include more properties for comprehensive testing.groupedAttributescould benefit from more diverse mock data.- There's a typo in the name
configurationForAddvancedSettings.- The naming of
configurationWithOutSynccould be improved for clarity.Addressing these points will enhance the quality and usefulness of the mock data for testing purposes.
...intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-advanced-settings/intacct-advanced-settings.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-advanced-settings/intacct-advanced-settings.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-advanced-settings/intacct-advanced-settings.component.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-advanced-settings/intacct-advanced-settings.component.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.fixture.ts (1)
954-981: LGTM: Comprehensive advancedSettings constantThe
advancedSettingsconstant provides a detailed mock structure for advanced settings, aligning well with the AdvancedSettingsGet type. It includes a good mix of data types and nested structures.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this constant and its structure for better maintainability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-advanced-settings/intacct-advanced-settings.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.fixture.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (13)
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-advanced-settings/intacct-advanced-settings.component.spec.ts (7)
1-18: LGTM: Comprehensive import list and test setupThe import list is comprehensive, including necessary Angular testing utilities, RxJS observables, and custom services. The setup looks good, with appropriate spy objects created for the required services.
20-77: LGTM: Comprehensive test setupThe beforeEach setup is thorough and well-structured. It includes:
- Creation of spy objects for all required services
- Proper TestBed configuration with necessary declarations, imports, and providers
- Initial value setup for service method returns
This setup ensures a consistent and controlled environment for each test case.
79-131: LGTM: Comprehensive initialization testsThe 'Initialization' describe block contains well-structured tests covering:
- Correct data loading and initialization
- Proper form setup
- Handling of onboarding and non-onboarding states
- Correct memo preview creation
These tests ensure that the component initializes correctly under various conditions.
133-158: LGTM: Well-structured watcher testsThe 'Watchers' describe block effectively tests the reactive behavior of the component:
- Verifies memo preview updates when setDescriptionField changes
- Checks validator updates for defaultPaymentAccount based on autoSyncPayments changes
These tests ensure that the component reacts correctly to form changes.
160-230: LGTM: Comprehensive save functionality testsThe 'Save' describe block thoroughly tests the save functionality:
- Handles saving during onboarding and non-onboarding states
- Verifies correct service calls and navigation
- Tests error handling during save operation
- Checks behavior when skipSelectiveExpenses is false
These tests ensure robust save functionality across various scenarios.
233-331: LGTM: Comprehensive utility function testsThe 'Utility Functions' describe block provides thorough coverage of the component's helper methods:
- Tests navigation functionality
- Verifies UI helpers like isOverflowing
- Checks dimension refreshing logic
- Covers form manipulation methods
- Verifies payment sync configuration logic
- Tests object comparison functionality
These tests ensure that all utility functions in the component work as expected.
1-331: Excellent test coverage and structureThis test suite for the IntacctAdvancedSettingsComponent is comprehensive and well-structured. It covers:
- Proper initialization and data loading
- Reactive form behavior
- Save functionality in various scenarios
- Utility functions and helper methods
The tests follow Angular testing best practices and provide thorough coverage of the component's functionality. This level of testing will help ensure the reliability and maintainability of the component.
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.fixture.ts (6)
14-17: LGTM: Import statements are correctly addedThe new import statements are properly formatted and relevant to the new constants being introduced in this file.
947-952: LGTM: adminEmails constant is well-structuredThe
adminEmailsconstant provides realistic mock data for admin email addresses, using the appropriate EmailOption type.
983-985: Consider expanding the expenseFilter constantThe
expenseFilterconstant is still minimal. As suggested in a previous review, consider expanding it to improve test coverage by adding more properties relevant to expense filtering, such as date range, expense types, or status.Example expansion:
export const expenseFilter = { count: 0, dateFrom: '2024-01-01', dateTo: '2024-12-31', expenseTypes: ['MEAL', 'TRAVEL'], status: 'APPROVED' };
987-994: Enhance groupedAttributes with more diverse mock dataThe
groupedAttributesconstant provides a good starting point for mock data. As suggested in a previous review, consider adding more items to each attribute type and including edge cases to improve test coverage.Example expansion:
export const groupedAttributes = { LOCATION: [ { destination_id: 'LOC1', value: 'Location 1' }, { destination_id: 'LOC2', value: 'Location 2 with a very long name' }, { destination_id: 'LOC3', value: '' } ] as IntacctDestinationAttribute[], // ... (expand other attribute types similarly) } as GroupedDestinationAttribute;
1004-1017: LGTM: Clear and descriptive configuration constantsThe new constants
configurationWithFyleToIntacct,configurationWithIntacctToFyle, andconfigurationWithOutSyncprovide clear mock data for different sync configuration scenarios. The naming is descriptive and the use of the Configuration type ensures type safety.
996-1002:⚠️ Potential issueFix typo in constant name
The
configurationForAdvancedSettingsconstant provides a good set of configuration options for advanced settings, using appropriate enum values. However, there's a typo in the constant name.Please apply the following change:
- export const configurationForAddvancedSettings = { + export const configurationForAdvancedSettings = {Likely invalid or redundant comment.
3 participants
Description
Clickup
Closes
https://app.clickup.com/t/86cwh86cc
https://app.clickup.com/t/86cwh86d1
Summary by CodeRabbit