Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: [#491] Fix the errors thrown by Lint/nilaway CI #642

Merged
merged 41 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

kkumar-gcc
Copy link
Member

πŸ“‘ Description

Closes goravel/goravel#491

@coderabbitai summary

βœ… Checks

  • Added test cases for my code

@kkumar-gcc kkumar-gcc requested a review from a team as a code owner September 12, 2024 05:10
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
  • πŸš€ Review Ready

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 13.91753% with 167 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 70.36%. Comparing base (52b284c) to head (346ae15).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
foundation/application.go 10.25% 35 Missing ⚠️
mail/job.go 0.00% 27 Missing ⚠️
database/service_provider.go 0.00% 17 Missing ⚠️
filesystem/file.go 0.00% 12 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
mail/service_provider.go 0.00% 14 Missing ⚠️
console/service_provider.go 0.00% 12 Missing ⚠️
crypt/service_provider.go 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
console/progress_bar.go 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
crypt/aes.go 37.50% 4 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
console/application.go 0.00% 3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
... and 12 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #642      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   71.00%   70.36%   -0.64%     
==========================================
  Files         189      189              
  Lines       11804    11926     +122     
==========================================
+ Hits         8381     8392      +11     
- Misses       2854     2956     +102     
- Partials      569      578       +9     

β˜” View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
πŸ“’ Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@devhaozi
Copy link
Member

CI failed, pls check.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50.

Benchmark suite Current: 58b5a40 Previous: cb355db Ratio
Benchmark_Fatal 2e-7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op 1e-7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op 2
Benchmark_Fatal - ns/op 2e-7 ns/op 1e-7 ns/op 2

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@kkumar-gcc
Copy link
Member Author

CI failed, pls check.

Sorry @devhaozi , it’s still not finished, so I’ll make it a draft for now. My local machine was hanging when I used NilAway, so I was pushing changes after making some adjustments to run NilAway properly.

@kkumar-gcc kkumar-gcc marked this pull request as draft September 12, 2024 06:55
@hwbrzzl
Copy link
Contributor

hwbrzzl commented Sep 18, 2024

CI failed

@hwbrzzl
Copy link
Contributor

hwbrzzl commented Sep 18, 2024

This PR is ready for review, right? it's still draft.

@kkumar-gcc
Copy link
Member Author

It's completed from my side

@kkumar-gcc kkumar-gcc marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2024 14:47
Copy link
Contributor

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great PR, we can make a deeper optimization.

console/application.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
console/application.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
console/application_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crypt/aes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ type ServiceProvider struct {

func (crypt *ServiceProvider) Register(app foundation.Application) {
app.Singleton(Binding, func(app foundation.Application) (any, error) {
return NewAES(app.MakeConfig(), app.GetJson()), nil
return NewAES(app.MakeConfig(), app.GetJson())
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should judge nil here.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should do that here it is better to return error here it will be judged when calling MakeAES anyways.

foundation/application.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
foundation/application.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
http/service_provider.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
mail/job.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
testing/test_case.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Sep 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great PR πŸ‘

console/service_provider.go Show resolved Hide resolved
validation/service_provider.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Sep 29, 2024
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Sep 29, 2024
hwbrzzl
hwbrzzl previously approved these changes Sep 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great

@kkumar-gcc kkumar-gcc merged commit b310a98 into master Sep 30, 2024
10 of 13 checks passed
@kkumar-gcc kkumar-gcc deleted the kkumar-gcc/#491 branch September 30, 2024 06:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

✨ [Feature] Fix the errors thrown by Lint/nilaway CI
3 participants