add checkout

[KmakD]

Final fix for backport action

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated internal workflow to improve reliability of the backport process. No impact on user-facing features.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The backport workflow configuration was updated to explicitly add a repository checkout step using actions/checkout@v4 before executing the backport action. No other logic, conditions, or inputs in the workflow were changed.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
.github/workflows/backport.yaml	Added an explicit actions/checkout@v4 step before the backport action.

Possibly related PRs

• add backport action #556: Adds the initial backport workflow that this PR modifies by introducing an explicit checkout step.

Suggested reviewers

• rafal-gorecki

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/workflows/backport.yaml (1)

25-25: Consider fetching full history for cherry-picks
By default, actions/checkout does a shallow clone (fetch-depth: 1), which might omit tags or branches needed for proper backports. You can include the full Git history by specifying:

- uses: actions/checkout@v4
  with:
    fetch-depth: 0

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 592d63b and 8e1ba04.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/backport.yaml (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)

• GitHub Check: Run unit tests hardware build type
• GitHub Check: Run unit tests simulation build type

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/backport.yaml (1)

25-25: Explicit checkout step is necessary
Adding the actions/checkout@v4 step ensures that the backport-action has access to the repository contents before it runs.