Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add HighAvailability repo #6091

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2025
Merged

add HighAvailability repo #6091

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2025

Conversation

fabbione
Copy link

this will be required in the context of 2 Nodes OpenShift

See: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPEDGE-1493

@fabbione
add HighAvailability repo
921636b 
this will be required in the context of 2 Nodes OpenShift
See: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPEDGE-1493

Signed-off-by: Fabio M. Di Nitto <[email protected]>
@fabbione
Copy link
Author

See also:

https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/coreos/redhat-coreos/-/merge_requests/1553

openshift/os#1743

openshift/machine-config-operator#4843

This was referenced Feb 11, 2025
Merged
Open
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 11, 2025

@jlebon: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

vfreex
vfreex approved these changes Feb 13, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@vfreex vfreex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 13, 2025
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 13, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jlebon, vfreex

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 13, 2025
@joepvd
Copy link
Contributor

joepvd commented Feb 13, 2025

/hold
Seeking confirmation that HA repo is supported "long enough" for 9.6 based ystreams.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 13, 2025
@fabbione
Copy link
Author

/hold Seeking confirmation that HA repo is supported "long enough" for 9.6 based ystreams.

Yes I confirm that HA repo is EUS and follow the same support as RHEL9.6

@joepvd
Copy link
Contributor

joepvd commented Feb 13, 2025

/unhold
/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Feb 13, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 762e2cf into openshift-eng:openshift-4.19 Feb 13, 2025
2 checks passed
@fabbione fabbione deleted the openshift-4.19-2no-ha branch February 14, 2025 06:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vfreex vfreex vfreex approved these changes

@jlebon jlebon jlebon approved these changes

Assignees

@vfreex vfreex

Labels
acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@fabbione @joepvd @vfreex @jlebon