Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-17157: operators/v1alpha1: expose CSV copied logic #289

Conversation

stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Member

We want to use a partial object metadata query for CSVs to reduce resource utilization. We still want to ask questions about whether these CSVs are copied, so we need to refactor this method to take only object metadata. While it's not a perfect port of the previous logic, it defies explanation how an object would have all the other markings of being copied but the wrong status.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from anik120 and jmrodri August 2, 2023 14:45
@stevekuznetsov stevekuznetsov changed the title operators/v1alpha1: expose CSV copied logic OCPBUGS-17157: operators/v1alpha1: expose CSV copied logic Aug 2, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 2, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #289 (0e9374d) into master (92e4341) will increase coverage by 0.22%.
The diff coverage is 85.71%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #289      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   41.94%   42.16%   +0.22%     
==========================================
  Files          39       39              
  Lines        3488     3491       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         1463     1472       +9     
+ Misses       1879     1873       -6     
  Partials      146      146              
Files Changed Coverage Δ
pkg/operators/v1alpha1/clusterserviceversion.go 73.25% <85.71%> (+8.19%) ⬆️

Copy link
Contributor

@perdasilva perdasilva left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@stevekuznetsov stevekuznetsov added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Aug 3, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 3, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: stevekuznetsov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

We want to use a partial object metadata query for CSVs to reduce
resource utilization. We still want to ask questions about whether these
CSVs are copied, so we need to refactor this method to take only object
metadata. While it's not a perfect port of the previous logic, it defies
explanation how an object would have all the other markings of being
copied but the wrong status.

Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 3, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 3, 2023

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Member Author

Going to self-tag since all I did was add a unit test to appease the coverage gods

@stevekuznetsov stevekuznetsov added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 3, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 409ec70 into operator-framework:master Aug 3, 2023
5 checks passed
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

I post-merge lgtm XD

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants