-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: Updates api ip address & fix loop #15
Open
fe51
wants to merge
2
commits into
pyronear:main
Choose a base branch
from
fe51:fix-apiurl-loop
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+3
−12
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ export const useImages = () => { | |
for (let index = 0; index < 50; index++) { | ||
try { | ||
const data = await axios.get( | ||
'http://141.94.127.211:8000/get_unlabeled_random_event', | ||
'http://57.128.107.129:8000/get_unlabeled_random_event', | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe we can extract |
||
); | ||
|
||
images.push({ | ||
|
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ export const useImages = () => { | |
export const useSendFireResult = () => { | ||
const { mutate } = useMutation({ | ||
mutationFn: async (data: { id: number; label: number }) => { | ||
axios.post(`http://141.94.127.211:8000/labelize_event/${data.id}`, { | ||
axios.post(`http://57.128.107.129:8000/labelize_event/${data.id}`, { | ||
label: data.label, | ||
}); | ||
}, | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can have a look later but here we are doing something that is not great : we are awaiting for request
i
to finish before triggering requesti+1
.A better approach would be to run all requests in parallel with
Promise.allSettled
.Promise.allSettled
is better in this case thanPromise.all
because it won't throw an error if one of the call fails.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall the best approach would be to have a route that returns a list of events, so that we don't need to trigger
n
calls to getn
events.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am kind of react/tsx noob to implement Promise.all/allSettled but you are right, we want to avoid error if one of the call fails !
Yes, i agree -> a route returning a list of events (with a param
n
and a default value !) -> I am taking care to have this route soon !