Skip to content

Conversation

@traversaro
Copy link
Member

Since RoboStack/ros-jazzy#5 and several follow up PRs, robostack now provides ROS Jazzy packages, so we can use them in CI. I also removed iron from the CI, as it is now EOL: https://docs.ros.org/en/iron/Releases/End-of-Life.html .

@traversaro
Copy link
Member Author

The CI fails with:

In file included from /home/runner/work/yarp-devices-ros2/yarp-devices-ros2/src/devices/frameTransformSet_nwc_ros2/frameTransformSet_nwc_ros2.cpp:6:
/home/runner/work/yarp-devices-ros2/yarp-devices-ros2/src/devices/frameTransformSet_nwc_ros2/frameTransformSet_nwc_ros2.h:72:10: error: conflicting return type specified for 'virtual bool FrameTransformSet_nwc_ros2::setTransforms(const std::vector<yarp::math::FrameTransform>&)'
   72 |     bool setTransforms(const std::vector<yarp::math::FrameTransform>& transforms) override;
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /home/runner/work/yarp-devices-ros2/yarp-devices-ros2/src/devices/frameTransformSet_nwc_ros2/frameTransformSet_nwc_ros2.h:11:
/home/runner/miniconda3/envs/test/include/yarp/dev/IFrameTransformStorage.h:39:36: note: overridden function is 'virtual yarp::dev::ReturnValue yarp::dev::IFrameTransformStorageSet::setTransforms(const std::vector<yarp::math::FrameTransform>&)'
   39 |     virtual yarp::dev::ReturnValue setTransforms(const std::vector<yarp::math::FrameTransform>& transforms) = 0;
      |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/runner/work/yarp-devices-ros2/yarp-devices-ros2/src/devices/frameTransformSet_nwc_ros2/frameTransformSet_nwc_ros2.h:73:10: error: conflicting return type specified for 'virtual bool FrameTransformSet_nwc_ros2::setTransform(const yarp::math::FrameTransform&)'
   73 |     bool setTransform(const yarp::math::FrameTransform& transform) override;
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~

but this is due to some braking changes in robotology/yarp#3169, that also affect the master branch.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@randaz81 randaz81 merged commit f4bbeaa into master Feb 24, 2025
22 of 26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants