Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PPM: implement service.targetPort as configurable #648
PPM: implement service.targetPort as configurable #648
Changes from 1 commit
1160315
648c06b
a4c7289
e617369
e63cdc0
1112c7d
52948cb
d080dbe
9bfe46b
6dfbbe9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Besides
service.targetPort
andpod.port
, there are a bunch of other4242
references in the values, like theconfig.HTTP.Listen = :4242
setting, liveness/startup probe. I assume users would have to find-and-replace all4242
references manually to fully change the running port?Is it possible to use a template variable here so you only have to set
4242
once somewhere?Otherwise this is fine of course, as it's still better than what we had before.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @glin !
I created #652 to capture this. I'd like to see us do this across all three products to be consistent.