Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Identify style properties as experimental #132

Open
wants to merge 20 commits into
base: into-hl7
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

isaacvetter
Copy link
Member

Remove location launch context parameter and scope.

Remove location launch context parameter and scope.
Identify the SMART style JSON objects properties as experimental by
adding the word "experimental" in italics.
@isaacvetter isaacvetter changed the title Remove Location Remove Location and identify style *properties* as experimental Mar 22, 2017
@isaacvetter isaacvetter changed the title Remove Location and identify style *properties* as experimental Remove Location and identify style properties as experimental Mar 22, 2017
@kpshek
Copy link
Contributor

kpshek commented Apr 17, 2017

Thanks for taking point on this @isaacvetter. Rather than having a separate page for the 'experimental SMART styling attributes', what if we created a separate 'experimental' page that could host all portions of SMART we eventually deem experimental?

Also, I think it'd be best to remove the location attribute on a separate pull request so that we can keep the discussion/decisions around these disparate items distinct from one another.

This reverts commit 42daf76.
@isaacvetter isaacvetter changed the title Remove Location and identify style properties as experimental Identify style properties as experimental Jul 14, 2017
instead of experimental SMART styling, per kpshek's comment
@isaacvetter
Copy link
Member Author

Hey @kpshek - updated per your suggestionsin April. Please review and merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants