Skip to content

Move the git-sync implementation to operator-rs #623

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

siegfriedweber
Copy link
Member

@siegfriedweber siegfriedweber commented May 7, 2025

Description

Move the git-sync implementation to operator-rs

Definition of Done Checklist

  • Not all of these items are applicable to all PRs, the author should update this template to only leave the boxes in that are relevant
  • Please make sure all these things are done and tick the boxes

Author

  • Changes are OpenShift compatible
  • Helm chart can be installed and deployed operator works
  • Integration tests passed (for non trivial changes)
  • Changes need to be "offline" compatible

Reviewer

  • Code contains useful comments
  • Code contains useful logging statements
  • (Integration-)Test cases added
  • Documentation added or updated. Follows the style guide.
  • Changelog updated
  • Cargo.toml only contains references to git tags (not specific commits or branches)

Acceptance

  • Feature Tracker has been updated
  • Proper release label has been added
  • Roadmap has been updated

Comment on lines +36 to +38

[patch."https://github.com/stackabletech/operator-rs.git"]
stackable-operator = { git = "https://github.com/stackabletech//operator-rs.git", branch = "feat/git-sync" }
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO: Upgrade to stackable-operator 0.93.0

@siegfriedweber siegfriedweber marked this pull request as ready for review May 8, 2025 14:39
@siegfriedweber siegfriedweber requested a review from a team May 8, 2025 14:39
@siegfriedweber siegfriedweber moved this to Development: Waiting for Review in Stackable Engineering May 8, 2025
@adwk67 adwk67 requested review from adwk67 and removed request for a team May 9, 2025 11:08
@adwk67 adwk67 moved this from Development: Waiting for Review to Development: In Review in Stackable Engineering May 9, 2025
Copy link
Member

@adwk67 adwk67 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Relevant tests (gitsync) are fine. I also ran the airflow demo without any problems (which shouldn't be affected by this PR, but just to be sure). LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Development: In Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants