-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
Removal ExecutionPolicy
template parameter from brick
s
#2148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
SergeyKopienko
merged 41 commits into
main
from
dev/skopienko/remove_execution_policy_from_bricks
Apr 14, 2025
Merged
Removal ExecutionPolicy
template parameter from brick
s
#2148
SergeyKopienko
merged 41 commits into
main
from
dev/skopienko/remove_execution_policy_from_bricks
Apr 14, 2025
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bcf415f
to
c7403a2
Compare
c7403a2
to
3faccca
Compare
This was referenced Mar 31, 2025
2001e33
to
8120dcd
Compare
ExecutionPolicy
template parameter from briksExecutionPolicy
template parameter from brick
s
882230c
to
e9c5745
Compare
SergeyKopienko
commented
Apr 11, 2025
0a25533
to
9a4e2c8
Compare
…review comment: We have the specialization by a hetero tag, so we don't need std::enable_if_t here.
…x review comment: We have the specialization by a hetero tag, so we don't need std::enable_if_t here.
28626c9
to
61b5e06
Compare
…l_n - fix review comment: We have the specialization by a hetero tag, so we don't need std::enable_if_t here." This reverts commit 61b5e06.
…l - fix review comment: We have the specialization by a hetero tag, so we don't need std::enable_if_t here." This reverts commit d5f09f3.
…::__internal::__is_host_dispatch_tag_v<_Tag>> from struct __brick_copy, struct __brick_copy_n, struct __brick_move" This reverts commit 09ddfbb.
MikeDvorskiy
approved these changes
Apr 11, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
This was referenced Apr 17, 2025
timmiesmith
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In this PR we remove
ExecutionPolicy
template parameter from bricks according to our offline discussion.Other linked PR's: #2152, #2153
Issue: #2110