Skip to content

Removal ExecutionPolicy template parameter from bricks #2148

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 41 commits into from
Apr 14, 2025

Conversation

SergeyKopienko
Copy link
Contributor

@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko commented Mar 27, 2025

In this PR we remove ExecutionPolicy template parameter from bricks according to our offline discussion.

Other linked PR's: #2152, #2153

Issue: #2110

@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko added this to the 2022.9.0 milestone Mar 27, 2025
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko force-pushed the dev/skopienko/remove_execution_policy_from_bricks branch from bcf415f to c7403a2 Compare March 27, 2025 14:37
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko marked this pull request as draft March 27, 2025 15:00
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko force-pushed the dev/skopienko/remove_execution_policy_from_bricks branch from c7403a2 to 3faccca Compare March 27, 2025 18:49
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2025 08:12
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko force-pushed the dev/skopienko/remove_execution_policy_from_bricks branch from 2001e33 to 8120dcd Compare April 1, 2025 12:22
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko changed the title Remove ExecutionPolicy template parameter from briks Remove ExecutionPolicy template parameter from bricks Apr 1, 2025
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko force-pushed the dev/skopienko/remove_execution_policy_from_bricks branch 2 times, most recently from 882230c to e9c5745 Compare April 11, 2025 12:39
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko force-pushed the dev/skopienko/remove_execution_policy_from_bricks branch from 0a25533 to 9a4e2c8 Compare April 11, 2025 13:00
…review comment: We have the specialization by a hetero tag, so we don't need std::enable_if_t here.
…x review comment: We have the specialization by a hetero tag, so we don't need std::enable_if_t here.
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko force-pushed the dev/skopienko/remove_execution_policy_from_bricks branch from 28626c9 to 61b5e06 Compare April 11, 2025 13:32
@uxlfoundation uxlfoundation deleted a comment from MikeDvorskiy Apr 11, 2025
…l_n - fix review comment: We have the specialization by a hetero tag, so we don't need std::enable_if_t here."

This reverts commit 61b5e06.
…l - fix review comment: We have the specialization by a hetero tag, so we don't need std::enable_if_t here."

This reverts commit d5f09f3.
…::__internal::__is_host_dispatch_tag_v<_Tag>> from struct __brick_copy, struct __brick_copy_n, struct __brick_move"

This reverts commit 09ddfbb.
Copy link
Contributor

@MikeDvorskiy MikeDvorskiy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko merged commit 1c36346 into main Apr 14, 2025
19 checks passed
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko deleted the dev/skopienko/remove_execution_policy_from_bricks branch April 14, 2025 07:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants