feat: Metadata panel into separate package, UI bug fixes, Code improvements #950
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lazysegtree has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThis change refactors file metadata handling by removing internal metadata utility functions and types, and introducing a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant MainModel
participant MetadataModel
participant MetadataPkg
User->>MainModel: Selects file / requests metadata
MainModel->>MetadataPkg: GetMetadata(filePath, ...)
MetadataPkg->>MetadataPkg: Extract & sort metadata
MetadataPkg-->>MainModel: Return Metadata struct
MainModel->>MetadataModel: SetMetadata(Metadata)
User->>MainModel: Navigates metadata panel (up/down)
MainModel->>MetadataModel: ListUp() / ListDown()
MainModel->>MetadataModel: Render(focused)
MetadataModel-->>MainModel: Rendered string
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~90 minutes Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
lazysegtree
force-pushed
the
metadata_separation
branch
from
a9d08ec to
c20f5e6
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md (1)
16-19: Fix the placeholder path and incomplete coverage information.The coverage section contains a placeholder path and incomplete coverage information.
Apply this diff to fix the issues:
-cd /path/to/ui/metadata +cd src/internal/ui/metadata go test -cover -``` -Current coverage is . +``` + +Current coverage: Run `go test -cover` to see current coverage.src/internal/ui/metadata/model_test.go (1)
17-17: Fix typo in test struct field name.There's a typo in the struct field name
expectedRendeIndex- it should beexpectedRenderIndexto match the actual field name in the Model struct.Apply this diff to fix the typo:
- expectedRendeIndex int + expectedRenderIndex intAnd update all references:
- expectedRendeIndex: 1, + expectedRenderIndex: 1,- expectedRendeIndex: 0, + expectedRenderIndex: 0,- expectedRendeIndex: 3, + expectedRenderIndex: 3,- expectedRendeIndex: 4, + expectedRenderIndex: 4,- assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedRendeIndex, tt.m.renderIndex) + assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedRenderIndex, tt.m.renderIndex)Also applies to: 26-26, 35-35, 44-44, 53-53, 64-64
src/internal/utils/file_utils.go (2)
205-226: LGTM! Well-implemented directory size calculation.The function properly:
- Uses
filepath.WalkDirfor efficient directory traversal- Handles errors gracefully with logging
- Accumulates file sizes correctly
- Continues processing despite individual file errors
The TODO comment indicates unit tests are needed - consider prioritizing this for such a utility function.
228-243: LGTM! Solid MD5 checksum implementation.The function demonstrates good practices:
- Proper error handling with wrapped errors
- Correct use of
deferfor file cleanup- Standard library usage for hash calculation
- Clear and readable implementation
The TODO comment indicates unit tests are needed - this would be valuable for ensuring correctness across different file types and edge cases.
src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go (2)
25-30: Consider implementing dimension validation as indicated by TODO.The TODO comment suggests validating that dimensions are at least 2x2, which would prevent potential rendering issues with border and content display.
Consider adding the validation:
func (m *Model) SetDimensions(width int, height int) { + if width < 2 || height < 2 { + // Log warning or set minimum dimensions + return + } m.width = width m.height = height }
32-37: Fix typo in method name.Method name
SetMedatadashould beSetMetadata(missing 't').-func (m *Model) SetMedatada(metadata Metadata) { +func (m *Model) SetMetadata(metadata Metadata) {The logic for updating metadata and resetting render index when invalid is correct.
src/internal/model.go (3)
61-65: Update the outdated comment to reflect the new structure.The comment "Path of the file whose metadata is this" is no longer accurate since the path is now encapsulated within the
metadata.Metadatatype.type MetadataMsg struct { - // Path of the file whose metadata is this metadata metadata.Metadata reqID int }
147-150: Consider implementing the metadata fetch optimization mentioned in TODOs.The TODO comments raise valid performance concerns about unnecessary metadata fetches during scrolling. This could impact user experience with frequent metadata updates.
Would you like me to open an issue to track implementing a smarter metadata fetch strategy that avoids updates during rapid scrolling?
118-121: Consider moving this logic as suggested by the TODO.The metadata render reset logic is functional but could be better organized in a utility function for cleaner separation of concerns.
Would you like me to suggest a utility function structure for managing panel focus state changes?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
src/internal/default_config.go(2 hunks)src/internal/function.go(0 hunks)src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go(0 hunks)src/internal/handle_panel_up_down_test.go(0 hunks)src/internal/key_function.go(2 hunks)src/internal/model.go(8 hunks)src/internal/model_render.go(0 hunks)src/internal/type.go(2 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/model_test.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/utils.go(1 hunks)src/internal/utils/file_utils.go(2 hunks)src/internal/wheel_function.go(2 hunks)
🧠 Learnings (10)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:25:06.352Z
Learning: PR #770 "Sidebar code separation" is a refactoring and code reorganization effort with no new features. It involves moving code, updating import paths, renaming functions to follow PascalCase convention, and consolidating sidebar-related functionality into a dedicated package.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#906
File: src/internal/file_panel.go:11-14
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T05:32:53.131Z
Learning: lazysegtree is concerned about the efficiency impact of adding bounds checking to frequently called methods like getSelectedItem() in file panels, preferring to defer such changes to consider performance implications.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#935
File: website/src/content/docs/changelog.md:17-26
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T10:32:28.063Z
Learning: In the superfile changelog (website/src/content/docs/changelog.md), lazysegtree prefers to maintain the existing heading format with main version headings using # and sub-sections using #### (Update, Bug fix, Optimization, etc.) consistently throughout all releases, prioritizing established format consistency over strict markdown heading hierarchy compliance.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#953
File: website/public/install.ps1:25-25
Timestamp: 2025-07-21T08:49:13.041Z
Learning: In the superfile PowerShell installer (website/public/install.ps1), lazysegtree prefers that users supply correct environment variable values (like SPF_INSTALL_VERSION without leading 'v') rather than adding validation code to handle malformed input, following the principle that users should provide properly formatted values.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#953
File: website/public/install.sh:42-42
Timestamp: 2025-07-21T08:49:44.603Z
Learning: In the superfile bash installer (website/public/install.sh), lazysegtree maintains the same principle as the PowerShell installer - users should supply correct environment variable values (SPF_INSTALL_VERSION without leading 'v') rather than adding validation code to handle malformed input, following the philosophy that users should provide properly formatted values.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#775
File: src/internal/common/style_function.go:240-243
Timestamp: 2025-04-27T17:04:47.888Z
Learning: lazysegtree plans to refactor textinput.Model creation in the future to fix the code duplication issue that caused a bug where the sidebar search model was created without setting the Width property.
src/internal/wheel_function.go (3)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/consts.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T14:02:46.575Z
Learning: In Go packages, constants and variables should only be exported (capitalized) if they need to be accessed from outside their package. In the sidebar package, constants like sideBarInitialHeight should remain unexported as they're only used within the package.
src/internal/key_function.go (2)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
src/internal/utils/file_utils.go (1)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #887
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:53-53
Timestamp: 2025-06-21T15:17:49.464Z
Learning: In Go, filepath.Abs() internally calls filepath.Clean() on the result, so calling filepath.Clean() after filepath.Abs() is redundant and should be avoided.
src/internal/type.go (2)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
src/internal/ui/metadata/model_test.go (2)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
src/internal/default_config.go (2)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
src/internal/ui/metadata/utils.go (4)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #781
File: src/internal/ui/rendering/border.go:104-114
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:02:28.747Z
Learning: The BorderConfig.GetBorder method in src/internal/ui/rendering/border.go already protects against negative availWidth values through the condition actualWidth >= cnt*4 which ensures that availWidth is at least 1.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #825
File: src/internal/ui/rendering/renderer_core.go:95-108
Timestamp: 2025-05-22T04:42:07.369Z
Learning: In src/internal/ui/rendering/renderer_core.go, when truncating rendered output that exceeds the maximum height, we should drop all remaining lines after reaching totalHeight without adding an ellipsis or other truncation indicator, as the goal is to have exactly totalHeight lines.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go (2)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
src/internal/model.go (2)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (6)
src/internal/type.go (1)
src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go (1)
Model(9-19)
src/internal/ui/metadata/model_test.go (2)
src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go (1)
Metadata(15-20)src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go (1)
Model(9-19)
src/internal/default_config.go (2)
src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go (1)
New(21-23)src/internal/ui/sidebar/sidebar.go (1)
New(110-122)
src/internal/ui/metadata/utils.go (2)
src/internal/common/string_function.go (1)
TruncateMiddleText(49-59)src/internal/utils/ui_utils.go (1)
FooterWidth(6-8)
src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go (2)
src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go (1)
Metadata(15-20)src/internal/ui/spf_renderers.go (1)
MetadataRenderer(117-121)
src/internal/model.go (3)
src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go (3)
Metadata(15-20)NewMetadata(22-28)GetMetadata(73-77)src/config/icon/icon.go (2)
InOperation(37-37)Space(10-10)src/internal/utils/ui_utils.go (1)
FooterWidth(6-8)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go
- src/internal/model_render.go
- src/internal/handle_panel_up_down_test.go
- src/internal/function.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (10)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:25:06.352Z
Learning: PR #770 "Sidebar code separation" is a refactoring and code reorganization effort with no new features. It involves moving code, updating import paths, renaming functions to follow PascalCase convention, and consolidating sidebar-related functionality into a dedicated package.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#906
File: src/internal/file_panel.go:11-14
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T05:32:53.131Z
Learning: lazysegtree is concerned about the efficiency impact of adding bounds checking to frequently called methods like getSelectedItem() in file panels, preferring to defer such changes to consider performance implications.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#935
File: website/src/content/docs/changelog.md:17-26
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T10:32:28.063Z
Learning: In the superfile changelog (website/src/content/docs/changelog.md), lazysegtree prefers to maintain the existing heading format with main version headings using # and sub-sections using #### (Update, Bug fix, Optimization, etc.) consistently throughout all releases, prioritizing established format consistency over strict markdown heading hierarchy compliance.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#953
File: website/public/install.ps1:25-25
Timestamp: 2025-07-21T08:49:13.041Z
Learning: In the superfile PowerShell installer (website/public/install.ps1), lazysegtree prefers that users supply correct environment variable values (like SPF_INSTALL_VERSION without leading 'v') rather than adding validation code to handle malformed input, following the principle that users should provide properly formatted values.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#953
File: website/public/install.sh:42-42
Timestamp: 2025-07-21T08:49:44.603Z
Learning: In the superfile bash installer (website/public/install.sh), lazysegtree maintains the same principle as the PowerShell installer - users should supply correct environment variable values (SPF_INSTALL_VERSION without leading 'v') rather than adding validation code to handle malformed input, following the philosophy that users should provide properly formatted values.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#775
File: src/internal/common/style_function.go:240-243
Timestamp: 2025-04-27T17:04:47.888Z
Learning: lazysegtree plans to refactor textinput.Model creation in the future to fix the code duplication issue that caused a bug where the sidebar search model was created without setting the Width property.
src/internal/wheel_function.go (3)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/consts.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T14:02:46.575Z
Learning: In Go packages, constants and variables should only be exported (capitalized) if they need to be accessed from outside their package. In the sidebar package, constants like sideBarInitialHeight should remain unexported as they're only used within the package.
src/internal/key_function.go (2)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
src/internal/utils/file_utils.go (1)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #887
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:53-53
Timestamp: 2025-06-21T15:17:49.464Z
Learning: In Go, filepath.Abs() internally calls filepath.Clean() on the result, so calling filepath.Clean() after filepath.Abs() is redundant and should be avoided.
src/internal/type.go (2)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
src/internal/ui/metadata/model_test.go (2)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
src/internal/default_config.go (2)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
src/internal/ui/metadata/utils.go (4)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #781
File: src/internal/ui/rendering/border.go:104-114
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:02:28.747Z
Learning: The BorderConfig.GetBorder method in src/internal/ui/rendering/border.go already protects against negative availWidth values through the condition actualWidth >= cnt*4 which ensures that availWidth is at least 1.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #825
File: src/internal/ui/rendering/renderer_core.go:95-108
Timestamp: 2025-05-22T04:42:07.369Z
Learning: In src/internal/ui/rendering/renderer_core.go, when truncating rendered output that exceeds the maximum height, we should drop all remaining lines after reaching totalHeight without adding an ellipsis or other truncation indicator, as the goal is to have exactly totalHeight lines.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go (2)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
src/internal/model.go (2)
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: #770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (6)
src/internal/type.go (1)
src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go (1)
Model(9-19)
src/internal/ui/metadata/model_test.go (2)
src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go (1)
Metadata(15-20)src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go (1)
Model(9-19)
src/internal/default_config.go (2)
src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go (1)
New(21-23)src/internal/ui/sidebar/sidebar.go (1)
New(110-122)
src/internal/ui/metadata/utils.go (2)
src/internal/common/string_function.go (1)
TruncateMiddleText(49-59)src/internal/utils/ui_utils.go (1)
FooterWidth(6-8)
src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go (2)
src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go (1)
Metadata(15-20)src/internal/ui/spf_renderers.go (1)
MetadataRenderer(117-121)
src/internal/model.go (3)
src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go (3)
Metadata(15-20)NewMetadata(22-28)GetMetadata(73-77)src/config/icon/icon.go (2)
InOperation(37-37)Space(10-10)src/internal/utils/ui_utils.go (1)
FooterWidth(6-8)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
src/internal/wheel_function.go (1)
20-20: LGTM! Method calls correctly updated for the new metadata package.The changes properly update the method calls from
listUp()andlistDown()to the exportedListUp()andListDown()methods, consistent with the refactoring that moves metadata functionality into a separate package.Also applies to: 32-32
src/internal/key_function.go (1)
26-26: LGTM! Consistent method name updates for metadata navigation.The changes correctly update the method calls to use the exported
ListUp()andListDown()methods from the new metadata package, maintaining consistency with the refactoring effort.Also applies to: 39-39
src/internal/default_config.go (1)
6-6: LGTM! Proper integration of the new metadata package.The changes correctly import the new metadata package and initialize the
fileMetaDatafield usingmetadata.New(), following the same pattern as other components like the sidebar. This properly integrates the refactored metadata functionality into the default model configuration.Also applies to: 26-26
src/internal/ui/metadata/model_test.go (1)
9-67: Good test coverage for navigation functionality.The test effectively covers the core navigation functionality of the metadata model, including edge cases for wrapping behavior. The table-driven approach and comprehensive test scenarios provide good confidence in the ListUp/ListDown methods.
src/internal/type.go (2)
6-6: LGTM! Import addition follows established patterns.The import for the new
metadatapackage is correctly placed and follows the existing import organization structure.
108-109: LGTM! Model struct updates align with metadata package refactor.The changes appropriately:
- Replace the internal
fileMetaDatafield with the newmetadata.Modeltype- Add
metadataRequestCntfor tracking metadata requestsThese modifications support the separation of metadata handling into its dedicated package.
src/internal/utils/file_utils.go (1)
4-5: LGTM! Import additions support the MD5 checksum functionality.The
crypto/md5andencoding/heximports are appropriately added to support the newCalculateMD5Checksumfunction.src/internal/ui/metadata/utils.go (3)
10-18: LGTM! Simple and efficient max key length calculation.The function correctly iterates through metadata pairs to find the maximum key length needed for formatting alignment.
20-30: LGTM! Reasonable width calculation logic.The function appropriately:
- Calculates available space for values after accounting for keys and borders
- Ensures values get at least half the panel width for readability
- Adjusts formatting lengths accordingly
The width distribution logic makes sense for metadata display.
49-53: LGTM! Clean wrapper function for render dimension calculations.The function appropriately combines key length calculation with width computation in a clear, reusable interface.
src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go (4)
9-23: LGTM! Well-structured Model with clear separation of concerns.The Model struct appropriately separates:
- Data (metadata)
- Render state (renderIndex)
- UI dimensions (width, height)
The
New()constructor follows Go conventions by returning a zero-value struct.
54-72: LGTM! Robust navigation implementation with proper edge case handling.The navigation methods correctly implement:
- Cyclic navigation (wrap around at boundaries)
- Empty metadata protection
- Consistent behavior between up/down movement
The implementation matches the expected UI navigation patterns.
74-86: LGTM! Comprehensive blank state management.The methods properly handle:
- Clearing metadata with appropriate default message (
SetBlank)- Detecting blank state by checking both data and message (
IsBlank)- Allowing custom info messages (
SetInfoMsg)The implementation provides good flexibility for different metadata states.
88-99: LGTM! Well-structured render method with proper state handling.The render method effectively:
- Handles empty metadata by displaying info messages
- Uses consistent UI rendering with
ui.MetadataRenderer- Computes appropriate dimensions for formatting
- Shows pagination information in the border
- Delegates line formatting to utility functions
The implementation provides a clean separation between rendering logic and formatting utilities.
src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go (6)
15-36: LGTM! Clean Metadata struct design with appropriate accessors.The struct properly encapsulates:
- Key-value data as ordered pairs
- Informational messages for error/status display
- File path for reference
The constructor and accessor methods follow Go conventions and provide a clean interface.
42-71: LGTM! Well-implemented metadata sorting with clear prioritization.The sorting logic effectively:
- Prioritizes important metadata fields (Name, Size, Date Modified, Date Accessed)
- Uses
sort.SliceStableto maintain order stability- Falls back to alphabetical sorting for non-priority fields
- Handles all comparison cases correctly
The priority-based approach ensures consistent, user-friendly metadata display ordering.
73-77: LGTM! Clean separation of metadata extraction and sorting.The function appropriately separates concerns by delegating to
getMetaDataUnsortedfor extraction and then applying sorting, making the code more maintainable and testable.
79-97: LGTM! Proper symlink handling with appropriate error messages.The function correctly:
- Uses
os.Lstatto detect symlinks without following them- Uses
filepath.EvalSymlinksto check for broken links- Provides clear info messages for different symlink states
- Handles file stat errors appropriately
The symlink detection logic is more robust than the
IsSymlinkutility function reviewed earlier.
98-111: LGTM! Comprehensive basic metadata extraction with good performance considerations.The implementation effectively:
- Extracts essential metadata (name, size, modification time, permissions)
- Handles directory size calculation only when metadata panel is focused
- Shows awareness of performance implications with the TODO comment
The conditional expensive operations approach balances functionality with performance, which is appropriate for a file manager UI.
113-139: LGTM! Robust extended metadata extraction with proper error handling.The implementation handles extended metadata well:
- Proper nil checking for exiftool to prevent crashes
- Comprehensive error handling with logging that doesn't break execution flow
- Respects configuration settings for optional features (metadata, MD5 checksum)
- Continues processing despite individual extraction failures
The approach ensures the metadata panel remains functional even when some extended features fail.
src/internal/model.go (2)
292-294: LGTM! Clean addition for metadata panel sizing.The method properly calculates and sets the metadata panel dimensions, accounting for borders with the +2 padding.
522-522: LGTM! Proper delegation to the metadata package.The change correctly delegates rendering to the metadata model with appropriate focus state.
lazysegtree
force-pushed
the
metadata_separation
branch
from
b6d0b7b to
d562597
Compare
| offloaded to main model | ||
|
|
||
| # To-dos | ||
| - Add unit tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I plan to add unit tests in a new PR. This PR has grown too huge.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Create a github issue tracking adding unit tests for
- metadata fetching
- Functions in metadata package
- End to end test of integration of main model with metadata package.
Focus on what should be covered and tested, not how we should do it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
@lazysegtree I'll create a GitHub issue to track the unit testing requirements for the metadata package functionality.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Create a GitHub issue for metadata package unit testing
gh issue create \
--title "Add comprehensive unit tests for metadata package" \
--body "## Background
This issue tracks the addition of comprehensive unit tests for the metadata package functionality that was separated in PR #950.
## Testing Areas to Cover
### 1. Metadata Fetching
- Test \`GetMetadata()\` function with various file types (regular files, directories, symlinks)
- Test metadata extraction with and without exiftool integration
- Test error handling for inaccessible files, broken symlinks, and permission issues
- Test metadata sorting functionality (\`sortMetadata\`)
- Verify MD5 checksum calculation for different file sizes
- Test directory size calculation (\`DirSize\`) for nested directory structures
### 2. Metadata Package Functions
- Test \`Metadata\` struct methods: \`GetPath()\`, \`GetData()\`, \`GetValue()\`
- Test \`Model\` struct functionality:
- Navigation methods: \`ListUp()\`, \`ListDown()\` with boundary conditions
- State management: \`SetMetadata()\`, \`SetBlank()\`, \`IsBlank()\`
- Render index management: \`ResetRender()\`, \`ResetRenderIfInvalid()\`
- Dimension handling: \`SetDimensions()\`
- Test utility functions in \`utils.go\`:
- \`getMaxKeyLength()\` with various metadata sets
- \`computeMetadataWidths()\` with different view widths
- \`formatMetadataLines()\` with truncation scenarios
- \`calculateMD5Checksum()\` error handling
### 3. End-to-End Integration Testing
- Test integration between main model and metadata package
- Verify metadata request tracking (\`metadataRequestCnt\`)
- Test metadata panel rendering with focus states
- Test metadata updates when file selection changes
- Verify proper cleanup and state reset scenarios
- Test window resize handling for metadata panel dimensions
## Success Criteria
- Achieve meaningful test coverage for all public functions and methods
- Include edge cases and error scenarios
- Ensure tests are deterministic and don't rely on external file system state
- Add benchmark tests for performance-critical functions like directory size calculation
## References
- PR #950: https://github.com/yorukot/superfile/pull/950
- Comment: https://github.com/yorukot/superfile/pull/950#discussion_r2226294633" \
--assignee lazysegtree
Length of output: 2258
@lazysegtree I've successfully created GitHub issue #957 to track the comprehensive unit testing requirements for the metadata package: #957
The issue covers all three areas you requested:
- Metadata fetching - Testing
GetMetadata()with various file types, exiftool integration, error handling, and utility functions - Metadata package functions - Coverage for all struct methods, navigation, state management, and utility functions
- End-to-end integration testing - Testing the integration between the main model and metadata package
The issue focuses on what should be tested rather than implementation details, as you requested. It includes success criteria and references back to this PR and comment for context.
(\ /)
( ._. )
o_(")(")
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.484Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#825
File: src/internal/model_render_test.go:15-25
Timestamp: 2025-05-22T04:53:45.663Z
Learning: In the superfile project, comments in test files documenting additional test cases with "// Additional tests" are intentional TODOs for future work and should not be flagged as missing implementations in PR reviews.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#775
File: src/internal/common/style_function.go:240-243
Timestamp: 2025-04-27T17:04:47.888Z
Learning: lazysegtree plans to refactor textinput.Model creation in the future to fix the code duplication issue that caused a bug where the sidebar search model was created without setting the Width property.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#906
File: src/internal/file_panel.go:11-14
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T05:32:53.131Z
Learning: lazysegtree is concerned about the efficiency impact of adding bounds checking to frequently called methods like getSelectedItem() in file panels, preferring to defer such changes to consider performance implications.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#935
File: website/src/content/docs/changelog.md:17-26
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T10:32:28.063Z
Learning: In the superfile changelog (website/src/content/docs/changelog.md), lazysegtree prefers to maintain the existing heading format with main version headings using # and sub-sections using #### (Update, Bug fix, Optimization, etc.) consistently throughout all releases, prioritizing established format consistency over strict markdown heading hierarchy compliance.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#953
File: website/public/install.ps1:25-25
Timestamp: 2025-07-21T08:49:13.041Z
Learning: In the superfile PowerShell installer (website/public/install.ps1), lazysegtree prefers that users supply correct environment variable values (like SPF_INSTALL_VERSION without leading 'v') rather than adding validation code to handle malformed input, following the principle that users should provide properly formatted values.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#953
File: website/public/install.sh:42-42
Timestamp: 2025-07-21T08:49:44.603Z
Learning: In the superfile bash installer (website/public/install.sh), lazysegtree maintains the same principle as the PowerShell installer - users should supply correct environment variable values (SPF_INSTALL_VERSION without leading 'v') rather than adding validation code to handle malformed input, following the philosophy that users should provide properly formatted values.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:25:06.352Z
Learning: PR #770 "Sidebar code separation" is a refactoring and code reorganization effort with no new features. It involves moving code, updating import paths, renaming functions to follow PascalCase convention, and consolidating sidebar-related functionality into a dedicated package.
ed4b8f2 to
0a773ac
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go (1)
38-46: Fix variable shadowing in GetValue method.The loop variable 'm' shadows the receiver variable 'm', which can be confusing and is a code smell.
Apply this diff to fix the variable shadowing:
-func (m Metadata) GetValue(key string) (string, error) { - for _, m := range m.data { - if m[0] == key { - return m[1], nil +func (m Metadata) GetValue(key string) (string, error) { + for _, pair := range m.data { + if pair[0] == key { + return pair[1], nil } } return "", fmt.Errorf("Key %s not found", key) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
.github/workflows/superfile-build-test.yml(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/const.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata_test.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/testdata/file1.txt(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/utils.go(1 hunks)src/internal/utils/file_utils.go(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- src/internal/ui/metadata/testdata/file1.txt
- .github/workflows/superfile-build-test.yml
- src/internal/utils/file_utils.go
- src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata_test.go
- src/internal/ui/metadata/utils.go
- src/internal/ui/metadata/const.go
- src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:25:06.352Z
Learning: PR #770 "Sidebar code separation" is a refactoring and code reorganization effort with no new features. It involves moving code, updating import paths, renaming functions to follow PascalCase convention, and consolidating sidebar-related functionality into a dedicated package.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#906
File: src/internal/file_panel.go:11-14
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T05:32:53.131Z
Learning: lazysegtree is concerned about the efficiency impact of adding bounds checking to frequently called methods like getSelectedItem() in file panels, preferring to defer such changes to consider performance implications.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#935
File: website/src/content/docs/changelog.md:17-26
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T10:32:28.063Z
Learning: In the superfile changelog (website/src/content/docs/changelog.md), lazysegtree prefers to maintain the existing heading format with main version headings using # and sub-sections using #### (Update, Bug fix, Optimization, etc.) consistently throughout all releases, prioritizing established format consistency over strict markdown heading hierarchy compliance.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#953
File: website/public/install.ps1:25-25
Timestamp: 2025-07-21T08:49:13.041Z
Learning: In the superfile PowerShell installer (website/public/install.ps1), lazysegtree prefers that users supply correct environment variable values (like SPF_INSTALL_VERSION without leading 'v') rather than adding validation code to handle malformed input, following the principle that users should provide properly formatted values.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#953
File: website/public/install.sh:42-42
Timestamp: 2025-07-21T08:49:44.603Z
Learning: In the superfile bash installer (website/public/install.sh), lazysegtree maintains the same principle as the PowerShell installer - users should supply correct environment variable values (SPF_INSTALL_VERSION without leading 'v') rather than adding validation code to handle malformed input, following the philosophy that users should provide properly formatted values.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#775
File: src/internal/common/style_function.go:240-243
Timestamp: 2025-04-27T17:04:47.888Z
Learning: lazysegtree plans to refactor textinput.Model creation in the future to fix the code duplication issue that caused a bug where the sidebar search model was created without setting the Width property.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go (6)
1-13: LGTM! Package structure and imports are well-organized.The package declaration and imports are appropriate for the metadata extraction functionality being implemented.
15-20: Good struct design with proper encapsulation.The Metadata struct design is well-thought-out, using a slice of [2]string for custom ordering and providing proper encapsulation with unexported fields.
48-74: Excellent sorting implementation with clear logic.The metadata sorting function is well-implemented with proper handling of priority fields and fallback to alphabetical sorting. The use of stable sort ensures consistent ordering.
76-80: Clean and well-designed public API.The GetMetadata function provides a clean interface with good separation of concerns between metadata extraction and sorting.
82-143: Comprehensive metadata extraction with good error handling.The function is well-implemented with proper error handling, symlink detection, and conditional feature support. The TODO comment on lines 109-112 shows good awareness of potential performance implications.
133-133: calculateMD5Checksum implementation verifiedThe
calculateMD5Checksumfunction is defined insrc/internal/ui/metadata/utils.go(lines 56–70) and correctly returns a checksum and error. No further action required.
lazysegtree
force-pushed
the
metadata_separation
branch
from
0a773ac to
829dc6a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
.github/workflows/superfile-build-test.yml(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/const.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata_test.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/testdata/file1.txt(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/utils.go(1 hunks)src/internal/utils/consts.go(1 hunks)src/internal/utils/file_utils.go(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/internal/utils/consts.go
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- src/internal/ui/metadata/testdata/file1.txt
- .github/workflows/superfile-build-test.yml
- src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata_test.go
- src/internal/utils/file_utils.go
- src/internal/ui/metadata/utils.go
- src/internal/ui/metadata/const.go
- src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:25:06.352Z
Learning: PR #770 "Sidebar code separation" is a refactoring and code reorganization effort with no new features. It involves moving code, updating import paths, renaming functions to follow PascalCase convention, and consolidating sidebar-related functionality into a dedicated package.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#906
File: src/internal/file_panel.go:11-14
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T05:32:53.131Z
Learning: lazysegtree is concerned about the efficiency impact of adding bounds checking to frequently called methods like getSelectedItem() in file panels, preferring to defer such changes to consider performance implications.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#935
File: website/src/content/docs/changelog.md:17-26
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T10:32:28.063Z
Learning: In the superfile changelog (website/src/content/docs/changelog.md), lazysegtree prefers to maintain the existing heading format with main version headings using # and sub-sections using #### (Update, Bug fix, Optimization, etc.) consistently throughout all releases, prioritizing established format consistency over strict markdown heading hierarchy compliance.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#953
File: website/public/install.ps1:25-25
Timestamp: 2025-07-21T08:49:13.041Z
Learning: In the superfile PowerShell installer (website/public/install.ps1), lazysegtree prefers that users supply correct environment variable values (like SPF_INSTALL_VERSION without leading 'v') rather than adding validation code to handle malformed input, following the principle that users should provide properly formatted values.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#953
File: website/public/install.sh:42-42
Timestamp: 2025-07-21T08:49:44.603Z
Learning: In the superfile bash installer (website/public/install.sh), lazysegtree maintains the same principle as the PowerShell installer - users should supply correct environment variable values (SPF_INSTALL_VERSION without leading 'v') rather than adding validation code to handle malformed input, following the philosophy that users should provide properly formatted values.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#775
File: src/internal/common/style_function.go:240-243
Timestamp: 2025-04-27T17:04:47.888Z
Learning: lazysegtree plans to refactor textinput.Model creation in the future to fix the code duplication issue that caused a bug where the sidebar search model was created without setting the Width property.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go (1)
src/internal/utils/file_utils.go (1)
DirSize(195-214)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Build and Test (ubuntu-latest)
- GitHub Check: Build and Test (macos-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go (10)
1-13: LGTM: Clean package structure and imports.The package declaration and imports are well-organized and appropriate for the metadata extraction functionality. The external dependency on
go-exiftoolis properly imported and aligns with the metadata extraction requirements.
15-20: Well-designed struct with appropriate field visibility.The
Metadatastruct design is clean with unexported fields and proper encapsulation. The use of[][2]stringfor data storage is well-justified by the comment on lines 48-50.
22-28: Constructor follows Go conventions.The
NewMetadataconstructor properly initializes all fields and follows standard Go naming conventions.
30-36: Accessor methods are straightforward and correct.Both
GetPath()andGetData()methods provide clean access to the internal fields.
52-74: Sorting implementation is correct and well-commented.The sorting logic properly handles priority fields and falls back to alphabetical sorting for non-priority fields. The stable sort ensures consistent ordering.
76-80: Clean separation of concerns in GetMetadata.The function properly delegates to the unsorted version and applies sorting, maintaining good separation of concerns.
82-100: Proper error handling for file operations.The function correctly handles file stat errors and symlink validation with appropriate error messages.
101-114: Good performance consideration with TODO comment.The TODO comment on lines 109-112 shows awareness of potential performance issues with directory size calculation. The conditional execution only when
metadataFocussedis true is a good optimization.
116-129: Robust exiftool integration with error handling.The exiftool integration properly checks for nil pointer and handles errors from metadata extraction with appropriate logging.
131-143: MD5 checksum calculation with proper error handling.The MD5 checksum calculation is conditionally executed based on configuration and includes proper error handling with logging.
lazysegtree
changed the title
lazysegtree
added
refactoring
bug fixes
high priority
Also fixes
Related issues
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests
Chores