-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
test: intacct advanced settings initialization #1024
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: intacct advanced settings initialization #1024
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the test suite for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.fixture.ts (1)
983-985: Clarify purpose and expand expenseFilter mock dataThe
expenseFilterconstant seems overly simplistic for a mock object. Consider expanding it to include more properties that would typically be associated with an expense filter, or clarify its purpose if this minimal structure is intentional.Suggestion:
export const expenseFilter = { count: 0, filters: [], date_range: { start_date: null, end_date: null } };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-advanced-settings/intacct-advanced-settings.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.fixture.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.fixture.ts (3)
954-981: LGTM! Verify mock data accuracyThe
advancedSettingsconstant looks well-structured and appropriate for its purpose. The use ofAdvancedSettingsGettype is consistent with the new import.Please verify that the mock data accurately represents the expected structure and values for advanced settings in the Intacct integration.
987-1002: LGTM! Well-structured mock data for grouped attributes and advanced settings configurationThe
groupedAttributesandconfigurationForAddvancedSettingsconstants are well-structured and use appropriate type castings. The use of enum values for expense objects in the configuration is a good practice, ensuring type safety and consistency.
14-17: Verify the necessity of QBD-related import in Intacct fixtureThe import of
QBDEmailOptionsfrom a QuickBooks Desktop related file seems out of place in an Intacct fixture. Please verify if this import is necessary or if it's a copy-paste error. If it's needed, consider creating a more generic type that both QBD and Intacct can use to avoid coupling between different integrations.src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-advanced-settings/intacct-advanced-settings.component.spec.ts (2)
68-97: Robust Initialization Tests Enhance CoverageThe added test cases effectively verify the component's initialization and ensure that all properties and forms are set up correctly. This enhances the reliability of the component and provides confidence in its behavior.
113-118: Ensure Memo Preview Matches DataIn the test
'should create memo preview correctly', please verify that the expected preview string aligns with the data used in the component. This ensures the test accurately reflects the component's functionality.Run the following script to confirm the memo fields used:
Clickup
https://app.clickup.com/t/86cwh86cw
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes