-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 859
WeeklyTelcon_20210125
Geoffrey Paulsen edited this page Jan 27, 2021
·
1 revision
- Dialup Info: (Do not post to public mailing list or public wiki)
- Aurelien Bouteiller (UTK)
- Brendan Cunningham (Cornelis Networks)
- Brian Barrett (AWS)
- Christoph Niethammer (HLRS)
- David Bernhold (ORNL)
- Edgar Gabriel (UH)
- Geoffrey Paulsen (IBM)
- George Bosilca (UTK)
- Harumi Kuno (HPE)
- Hessam Mirsadeghi (UCX/nVidia)
- Howard Pritchard (LANL)
- Jeff Squyres (Cisco)
- Joseph Schuchart
- Josh Hursey (IBM)
- Joshua Ladd (nVidia/Mellanox)
- Matthew Dosanjh (Sandia)
- Michael Heinz (Cornelis Networks)
- Raghu Raja (AWS)
- Ralph Castain (Intel)
- Todd Kordenbrock (Sandia)
- William Zhang (AWS)
- Akshay Venkatesh (NVIDIA)
- Austen Lauria (IBM)
- Naughton III, Thomas (ORNL)
- Artem Polyakov (nVidia/Mellanox)
- Brandon Yates (Intel)
- Charles Shereda (LLNL)
- Erik Zeiske
- Geoffroy Vallee (ARM)
- Mark Allen (IBM)
- Matias Cabral (Intel)
- Nathan Hjelm (Google)
- Noah Evans (Sandia)
- Scott Breyer (Sandia?)
- Shintaro iwasaki
- Tomislav Janjusic
- Xin Zhao (nVidia/Mellanox)
- v4.0 release, would like to take this ROMIO one-off fix instead of
- https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/8370 - Fixes HDF5 on LUSTRE
- Proposing take this one-off for v4.0.6, as a whole new ROMIO is a big change.
- Waiting on v4.0.6rc2 until we get an answer.
- Everyone seems okay with taking this into release branch, and waiting for ROMIO update on master.
- Just needs a review
- Issue 8334 - a performance regression with AVX512 on Skylake. Still digging into.
- Blocker for v4.1 release. Performance regression.
- Unclear if the scope is isolated to LAAMPS or all Allreduce.
- VASP - with lots of allreduce didn't see much perf difference AVX on/off
- Weird it wouldn't help, but AVX perf only helps large vector reductions.
- Horivod saw about 20% improvement in original UTK paper @ EURO-MPI
- Blocker for v4.1 release. Performance regression.
- Issue 8410 - Build Failure on Apple Silicon.
- Do we just need new updated string, or is that just one of the issues.
- Code changes we need in v4.1.
- Will have exact same problem in PMIx and PRRTE
- Performance with Atomic FIFO is another issue, might not need to backport to v4.1
- Issue 8367 - will take to UCX community
- Not yet brought up to UCX community. Josh will take up
- Issue 8379 - UCT appears to be default and not UCX
- Jeff repinged for request
- Does the community want this ULFM PR 7740 for OMPI v5.0? If so, we need a PRRTE v3.0
- Howard gave it a spin, and worked with a few issues.
-
-no-orte
CI tests will fail- This PR detects if you're using an external PRRTE, and if RT is not FT, then it errors out in the configure.
-
-no-orte
is just an alias to-no-prrte
, so if this is causing issues, may - We're pushing to externl PRRTE.
- This build should only abort if it's requested, but not found.
- Aurlien will fix, which will make CI fix.
- compiler fix is just duplicate typedefs.
-
- Aurelien will make a PR today to add some tests, but unsure how to add to MTT.
- Put into ibm suite, most will pickup by default.
- Howard gave it a spin, and worked with a few issues.
- Are we Feature Complete?
- PRRTE should be ready end of Q1.
- Based on v5.0 tracker, there is a bunch of stuff not in.
- GPU Direct support for OFI MTL
- AWS working on now. Need to rebase, and upstream.
- OFI BTL changes need to get upstreamed.
- Weeks for MTL
- Edgar atomicity issue for OMPIO. Not sure if it's a full feature, but need to have on radar.
- ETA: a few days after Edgar finds time. 2-3 weeks.
- Any other big features?
- Branch Date will discuss next week.
- How to implement so that
./configure --help
presents all configure options to users? - Didn't get to 1/25
- Process returns wrong result unless pml is
^ucx
. - Looks like the user is trying to use UCX with TCP inside of a container.
- Not sure how well tested UCX+TCP
- If users are using TCP sockets, why is selection picking UCX instead of OB1/TCP_BTL
- Should be straight forward to chase down, and
- Possibly an issue with collective and UCX in this runmode.
- Jeff can setup so we have single point of contact in github, that many members of organizations can watch
- Don't go crazy to start, just setup a few
- What do we want to do about ROMIO in general.
- OMPIO is the default everywhere.
- Giles is saying the changes we made are integration changes.
- There have been some OMPI specific changes put into ROMIO, meaning upstream maintainers refuse to help us with it.
- We may be able to work with upstream to make a clear API between the two.
- As a 3rd party package, should we move it upto the 3rd party packaging area, to be clear that we shouldn't make changes to this area?
- Need to look at this treematch thing. Upstream package that is now inside of Open-MPI.
- Might want a CI bot to watch a set of files, and flag PRs that violate principles like this.
- PR 8329 - convert README, HACKING, and possibly Manpages to restructured text.
- Uses https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/ (Python tool, can pip install)
- Has a built from this PR, so we can see what it looks like.
- Have a look. It's a different approach to have one document that's the whole thing.
- FAQ, README, HACKING.
- Do people even use manpages anymore? Do we need/want them in our tarballs?
How's the state of https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi-tests-public/
- Putting new tests there
- Very little there so far, but working on adding some more.
- Should have some new Sessions tests
-
What's the general state? Any known issues?
-
AWS would like to get.
-
Josh Ladd - Will take internally to see what they have to say.
-
From nVidia/Mellanox, Cuda Support is through UCX, SM Cuda isn't tested that much.
-
Hessam Mirsadeg - All Cuda awareness through UCX
-
May ask George Bosilica about this.
-
Don't want to remove a BTL if someone is interested in it.
-
UCX also supports TCP via CUDA
-
PRRTE CLI on v5.0 will have some GPU functionality that Ralph is working on
-
Update 11/17/2020
- UTK is interested in this BTL, and maybe others.
- Still gap in the MTL use-case.
- nVidia is not maintaining SMCuda anymore. All CUDA support will be through UCX
- What's the state of the shared memory in the BTL?
- This is the really old generation Shared Memory. Older than Vader.
- Was told after a certain point, no more development in SM Cuda.
- One option might be to
- Another option might be to bring that SM in SMCuda to Vader(now SM)
-
Discussion on:
- Didn't get to this week. :(
- Draft Request Make default static https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/8132
- One con is that many providers hard link against libraries, which would then make libmpi dependent on this.
- Non-Homogenous clusters (GPUs on some nodes, and non-GPUs on some other)
- ECP Community days ( March 30-April 1st )
- David Bernholdt and/or George Bosilica
- Each day 90 minute time slots.
- Get proposal in by this Friday.