Use small lock to protect resources related to irq in arch ARM.

[wangzhi-art]

Note: Please adhere to Contributing Guidelines.

Summary

Use small lock to protect resources about irq in arch ARM.

Impact

Some logic related to irq under arm architecture.

Testing

CI

[nuttxpr]

[Experimental Bot, please feedback here]

No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements as described. While it provides some information, it lacks crucial details and context. Here's a breakdown of the deficiencies:

Summary:

• Insufficient Detail: "Use small lock to protect resources about irq in arch ARM" is vague. Which resources are being protected? Why was this lock necessary (what race condition or bug did it fix)? How does the locking mechanism work (spinlock, mutex, etc.)?

Impact:

• Too Brief: "Some logic related to irq under arm architecture" is far too general. Be specific about which logic is affected. This section requires YES/NO answers for each impact category, followed by descriptions if YES. This PR omits all of that. Consider the impact on:
  • Users: Will any user-facing APIs change? Will applications need to be modified?
  • Build: Are there any new configuration options? Do existing Kconfig files need modification?
  • Hardware: Does this change only affect specific ARM architectures or boards? Does it affect any drivers?
  • Documentation: Does this change require updates to the NuttX documentation? If so, have these updates been made?
  • Security: Does this lock mitigate a potential vulnerability?
  • Compatibility: Does this change break compatibility with any existing code or configurations?

Testing:

• Insufficient Information: "CI" is not enough. While CI testing is important, local testing verification is required. List the specific build hosts (OS, CPU, compiler version) and targets (architecture, board, configuration) used for testing.
• Missing Logs: The PR provides no "before" and "after" logs to demonstrate the change's effect. Include relevant log snippets showing the issue before the change and the improved behavior after the change. If the change addresses a race condition, demonstrate that the race condition no longer occurs.

In short, the PR needs significantly more detail to meet the NuttX requirements. It should clearly explain the problem being solved, the solution implemented, and the impact of the change on different aspects of the system, backed up by concrete testing results.

[xiaoxiang781216]

merge with previous line

[xiaoxiang781216]

dup