-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
test: intacct c1 import settings util functions #1021
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: intacct c1 import settings util functions #1021
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes enhance the testing framework of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-c1-import-settings/intacct-c1-import-settings.component.spec.ts (3 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.fixture.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.fixture.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-c1-import-settings/intacct-c1-import-settings.component.spec.ts (4)
25-26: Imports are appropriately addedThe imported fixtures
blankMappingandcustomFieldFormValueare utilized correctly in the test cases.
33-35: Necessary imports added for testingThe imports for
ExpenseField,MappingSourceField, andConfigurationWarningOutare necessary for the new test cases and are correctly added.
72-73: TestBed configuration is correctly updatedThe additions to the
declarationsandimportsarrays in the TestBed configuration are appropriate for the component being tested.
399-407: Verify logic when handling warning acceptanceIn the
acceptDependentFieldWarningtest, whenhasAcceptedis set tofalse, theisDependentImportEnabledflag is set totrue. This may not align with expected behavior, as declining a warning might imply not enabling the import. Please verify if this logic is intentional.
...tacct/intacct-shared/intacct-c1-import-settings/intacct-c1-import-settings.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...tacct/intacct-shared/intacct-c1-import-settings/intacct-c1-import-settings.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...tacct/intacct-shared/intacct-c1-import-settings/intacct-c1-import-settings.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...tacct/intacct-shared/intacct-c1-import-settings/intacct-c1-import-settings.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-c1-import-settings/intacct-c1-import-settings.component.spec.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-c1-import-settings/intacct-c1-import-settings.component.spec.ts (6)
25-26: LGTMThe imports for
blankMappingandcustomFieldFormValueenhance the test fixtures appropriately.
333-492: Well-structured utility function testsThe addition of utility function tests improves the code coverage and ensures that the component's auxiliary methods are functioning correctly.
370-376: Duplicate comment: MockAbstractControlcorrectly in unit testsA previous review comment addressed the need to mock
AbstractControlaccurately in your tests. This concern remains applicable to the current code segment.
456-457: Duplicate comment: Correct indexing in test assertionAn earlier comment highlighted an indexing error where
component.costCategoryOption[component.costCodeFieldOption.length - 1]should likely becomponent.costCategoryOption[component.costCategoryOption.length - 1]. The issue persists and should be corrected as previously suggested.
488-489: Duplicate comment: Ensure array has sufficient elements before accessingA prior comment noted a potential out-of-bounds error when accessing
component.fyleFields[component.fyleFields.length - 2]. This concern is still relevant and should be addressed to prevent runtime errors.
490-491: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConfirm the necessity of reassigning
fyleFieldsIn the
saveFyleExpenseFieldmethod, reassigning the last element ofcomponent.fyleFieldstocomponent.customFieldOption[0]might be unnecessary and could introduce issues if the array is empty.Consider appending the new custom field option to the
fyleFieldsarray instead of reassigning:- component.fyleFields[component.fyleFields.length - 1] = component.customFieldOption[0]; + component.fyleFields.push(component.customFieldOption[0]);This ensures the custom field is added without overwriting existing entries, maintaining data integrity.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Clickup
Closes
https://app.clickup.com/t/86cwqhb7n
https://app.clickup.com/t/86cwqhb30
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes